RT Journal Article
SR Electronic
T1 A comparative analysis of the health, financial, equity, and cost-effectiveness impacts of maxillofacial surgery in Guinea
JF medRxiv
FD Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press
SP 2021.03.24.21254058
DO 10.1101/2021.03.24.21254058
A1 Hamer, Mirjam
A1 Alcorn, Dennis
A1 Diallo, Ibrahima
A1 Bah, Fatoumata B.Y
A1 Conde, Alhassane
A1 Traoré, Lancinè
A1 Millimounou, Etienne
A1 Peacock, Chelsea
A1 Glasgo, Chris
A1 Linz, Peter E.
A1 Shrime, Mark
A1 Diallo, Oumar Raphiou
YR 2021
UL http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2021/03/26/2021.03.24.21254058.abstract
AB Background Non-governmental organizations (NGOs) play a substantive role in the delivery of surgical services in in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs).Assessment of their outcomes, especially as they relate to outcomes of surgery done in country, remains limited.Methods A prospective analysis of maxillofacial surgery in Guinea. Outcomes of interest were changes in patient health, subjective well-being, and financial status; hardship financing and catastrophic expenditure; equitable distribution of surgical access; and cost-effectiveness.Results We followed 569 patients requiring maxillofacial surgery in Conakry, Guinea, 114 of whom got care at local university hospitals, and 455 of whom got their care with Mercy Ships, a surgical NGO. Patients were followed for between three months (local) and one year (NGO). All patients reported significant improvement in objective and subjective measures of health and in financial status. Approximately half had to borrow and sell to get care, with NGO patients borrowing less, on average. However, NGO patients faced more risk of catastrophic expenditure (41.2% vs. 28.1%, p < 0.001). NGO patients were significantly poorer, whether financial status was measured by asset wealth or monthly income (p < 0.001). Finally, surgical care by the NGO was cost effective.Conclusions In a prospective analysis of surgical patients in an LMIC, we find that surgery improves health and financial well-being. NGOs may be able to reach patients who would not be able to get care through their local system; however, this comes at a cost of increased initial financial risk. Finally, NGO-based surgical care is cost-effective.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementFunding for this study was supplied by Mercy Ships.Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:This study was approved by the Partners Health System IRB and by the Mercy Ships Research Ethics Council.All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesData are not publicly available