RT Journal Article
SR Electronic
T1 Retrospective Methodology to Estimate Daily Infections from Deaths (REMEDID) in COVID-19: the Spain case study
JF medRxiv
FD Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press
SP 2020.06.22.20136960
DO 10.1101/2020.06.22.20136960
A1 García-García, David
A1 Vigo, María Isabel
A1 Fonfría, Eva S.
A1 Herrador, Zaida
A1 Navarro, Miriam
A1 Bordehore, Cesar
YR 2021
UL http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2021/03/23/2020.06.22.20136960.abstract
AB The number of new daily infections is one of the main parameters to understand the dynamics of an epidemic. During the COVID-19 pandemic in 2020, however, such information has been underestimated. Here, we propose a retrospective methodology to estimate daily infections from daily deaths, because those are usually more accurately documented. This methodology is applied to Spain and its 19 administrative regions. Our results showed that probable infections during the first wave were between 35 and 42 times more than those officially documented on 14 March, when the national government decreed a national lockdown and 9 times more than those documented by the updated version of the official data. The national lockdown had a strong effect on the growth rate of virus transmission, which began to decrease immediately. Finally, the first inferred infection in Spain is about 43 days before it was officially reported during the first wave. The current official data show delays of 15-30 days in the first infection relative to the inferred infections in 63% of the regions. In summary, we propose a methodology that allows reinterpretation of official daily infections, improving data accuracy in infection magnitude and dates because it assimilates valuable information from the National Seroprevalence Studies.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementFunding This work was supported by the University of Alicante [COVID-19 2020-41.30.6P.0016 to CB] and the Ajuntament de Denia through the Montgo-Denia Research Station Agreement [2020-41.30.6O.00.01 to CB]. Acknowledgements We acknowledge Parques Nacionales (Ministerio para la Transicion Ecologica y Reto Demografico, Spain) and Generalitat Valenciana (Regional Government of Valencia, Spain) for the support of the Montgo-Denia Research Station. Editing was provided by Sea Pen Scientific Writing. Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:University of AlicanteAll necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesAll data used is available in the manuscript or in the references. The MATLAB code is available in the Supplementary Material.