PT - JOURNAL ARTICLE AU - Ray, Sumanta AU - Aruru, Meghana AU - Pyne, Saumyadipta TI - Identifying Patterns of Association and Transition in the Use of Addictive Substances over Five Decades in the United States AID - 10.1101/2021.03.11.21253386 DP - 2021 Jan 01 TA - medRxiv PG - 2021.03.11.21253386 4099 - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2021/03/20/2021.03.11.21253386.short 4100 - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2021/03/20/2021.03.11.21253386.full AB - Objectives To conduct weighted itemset analysis to identify patterns of polysubstance use from National Survey on Drug Use and Health (NSDUH) data.Methods We computed weighted support for every combination of one or more substances, termed as a drugset, used by individuals in the nationally representative NSDUH data over 5 decades (1965-2014). A computational framework for efficient representation and search of patterns of association between drugsets and demographics of user groups over time was developed. A new method for mining rules of transition between pairs of substances used within a time-interval was given.Results We identified the frequent drugsets from individual substance use data, and determined their representation among different demographic groups at different intervals. An interesting pattern of use of pain relievers and tranquilizers was detected for the age-group of 26-34 years. Transition rules for heroin use in the last decade (2004-2015) of data were mined.Conclusions Computation of weighted supports over time for every possible drugset in the data and their association with specific user groups produced a framework for generation and testing new and interesting hypotheses. The framework is useful to explore different combinations of substances used among diverse demographic groups including those that have received less attention in this problem.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementNo funding was received for this study.Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:Secondary data analysis. No IRB required.All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesData available upon request.