PT - JOURNAL ARTICLE AU - Pageaud, Simon AU - Ponthus, Nicolas AU - Gauchon, Romain AU - Pothier, Catherine AU - Rigotti, Christophe AU - Eyraud-Loisel, Anne AU - Bertoglio, Jean-Pierre AU - Bienvenüe, Alexis AU - Gueyffier, François AU - Vanhems, Philippe AU - Leboisne, Nicolas AU - Iwaz, Jean AU - Loisel, Stéphane AU - Roy, Pascal TI - Adapting French COVID-19 vaccination campaign duration to variant dissemination AID - 10.1101/2021.03.17.21253739 DP - 2021 Jan 01 TA - medRxiv PG - 2021.03.17.21253739 4099 - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2021/03/20/2021.03.17.21253739.short 4100 - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2021/03/20/2021.03.17.21253739.full AB - Background The outbreak of SARS-CoV-2 virus has caused a major international health crisis with serious consequences in terms of public health and economy. In France, two lockdown periods were decided in 2020 to avoid the saturation of intensive care units (ICU) and an increase in mortality. The rapid dissemination of variant SARS-CoV-2 VOC 202012/01 has strongly influenced the course of the epidemic. Vaccines have been rapidly developed. Their efficacy against the severe forms of the disease has been established, and their efficacy against disease transmission is under evaluation. The aim of this paper is to compare the efficacy of several vaccination strategies in the presence of variants in controlling the COVID-19 epidemic through population immunity.Methods An agent-based model was designed to simulate with different scenarios the evolution of COVID-19 pandemic in France over 2021 and 2022. The simulations were carried out ignoring the occurrence of variants then taking into account their diffusion over time. The expected effects of three Non-Pharmaceutical Interventions (Relaxed-NPI, Intensive-NPI, and Extended-NPI) to limit the epidemic extension were compared. The expected efficacy of vaccines were the values recently estimated in preventing severe forms of the disease (75% and 94%) for the current used vaccines in France (Pfizer-BioNTech and Moderna since January 11, 2021, and AstraZeneca since February 2, 2021). All vaccination campaigns reproduced an advanced age-based priority advised by the Haute Autorité de Santé. Putative reductions of virus transmission were fixed at 0, 50, 75 and 90%. The effects of four vaccination campaign durations (6-month, 12-month, 18-month and 24-month) were compared.Results In the absence of vaccination, the presence of variants led to reject the Relaxed-NPI because of a high expected number of deaths (170 to 210 thousands) and the significant overload of ICUs from which 35 thousand patients would be deprived. In comparison with the situation without vaccination, the number of deaths was divided by 7 without ICU saturation with a 6-month vaccination campaign. A 12-month campaign would divide the number of death by 3 with Intensive-NPI and by 6 with Extended-NPI (the latter being necessary to avoid ICU saturation). With 18-month and 24-month vaccination campaigns without Extended-NPI, the number of deaths and ICU admissions would explode.Conclusion Among the four compared strategies the 6-month vaccination campaign seems to be the best response to changes in the dynamics of the epidemic due to the variants. The race against the COVID-19 epidemic is a race of vaccination strategy. Any further vaccination delay would increase the need of strengthened measures such as Extended-NPI to limit the number of deaths and avoid ICU saturation.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementThis work was supported by Région Auvergne-Rhône-Alpes, Initiative d'excellence (IDEXLYON) - Université de Lyon, Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1 and École Centrale de Lyon and by the PHRCi-2020 COVID-3S supported by GIRCI Auvergne Rhône-Alpes.Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:No IRB necessaryAll necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesAll data used during this study are available on data.gouv.fr or in the published articles listed in the references, except APHP related data obtained from a personal communication of the EHESP. All data generated during this study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.