RT Journal Article
SR Electronic
T1 Identifying hidden Zika hotspots in Pernambuco, Brazil: A spatial analysis
JF medRxiv
FD Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press
SP 2021.03.15.21253657
DO 10.1101/2021.03.15.21253657
A1 Freitas, Laís Picinini
A1 Lowe, Rachel
A1 Koepp, Andrew E.
A1 Alves, Sandra Valongueiro
A1 Dondero, Molly
A1 Marteleto, Letícia J.
YR 2021
UL http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2021/03/18/2021.03.15.21253657.abstract
AB Northeast Brazil has the world’s highest rate of Zika-related microcephaly. Yet, in this hard-hit region, traditional case counts of Zika cannot accurately describe Zika risk. Reporting of Zika cases only became mandatory after its association with microcephaly in neonates, when the Zika epidemic was already declining in the region. To advance the study of the Brazilian Zika epidemic and its impacts, we identified hotspots of Zika in Pernambuco state, Northeast Brazil, using Aedes-borne diseases (dengue, chikungunya and Zika) and microcephaly data. We used the Kulldorff’s Poisson purely spatial scan statistic to detect low- and high-risk clusters and combined the results to identify the municipalities most affected by the Zika epidemic. Municipalities were classified as hotspots if they were part of any high-risk cluster, and classified according to a gradient of Zika burden during the epidemic, considering the strength of the evidence. In Pernambuco, officials confirmed 123,934 dengue cases, 167 Zika cases, and 32,983 chikungunya cases between 2014-2017, and 800 microcephaly cases between 2015-2017. We identified 26 Aedes-borne diseases clusters (11 high-risk), and 5 microcephaly cases clusters (3 high-risk). Combining the results, sixty-three out of 184 municipalities were identified as hotspots for Zika. The northeast of Pernambuco and the Sertão region were hit hardest by the Zika epidemic. The first is the most populous area, while the second has one of the highest rates of social and economic inequality in Brazil. The identification of Sertão as a Zika hotspot was only possible because the clusters results were combined. The under-reporting of acute infectious diseases is expected to be higher in poor areas. Therefore, using only Aedes-borne data does not correctly identify the high-risk areas. We successfully identified hidden Zika hotspots using a simple methodology combining Aedes-borne diseases and microcephaly information.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementThis research was supported by the Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (https://www.nichd.nih.gov/): grant R01HD091257 awarded to LJM (PI: LJM, co-investigator: MD), and grants P2CH042849 and T32HD007081 awarded to the Population Research Center at the University of Texas at Austin. RL was supported by a Royal Society Dorothy Hodgkin Fellowship (https://royalsociety.org/grants-schemes-awards/grants/dorothy-hodgkin-fellowship/).Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:This study was conducted under Institutional Review Board approval #2018-01-0055 from the University of Texas at Austin and the Brazilian National Commission for Research Ethics (CONEP - Comissão Nacional de Ética em Pesquisa) study approval CAAE: 34032920.1.0000.5149.All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).Yes I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesThe data underlying the results presented in the study are available at https://github.com/laispfreitas/PE_satscan/