PT - JOURNAL ARTICLE AU - Hernandez, Matthew M. AU - Banu, Radhika AU - Shrestha, Paras AU - Patel, Armi AU - Chen, Feng AU - Cao, Liyong AU - Fabre, Shelcie AU - Tan, Jessica AU - Lopez, Heidi AU - Chiu, Numthip AU - Shifrin, Biana AU - Zapolskaya, Inessa AU - Flores, Vanessa AU - Lee, Pui Yiu AU - Castañeda, Sergio AU - Ramírez, Juan David AU - Jhang, Jeffrey AU - Osorio, Giuliana AU - Gitman, Melissa R. AU - Nowak, Michael D. AU - Reich, David L. AU - Cordon-Cardo, Carlos AU - Sordillo, Emilia Mia AU - Paniz-Mondolfi, Alberto E. TI - Comparison of SARS-CoV-2 detection in Saliva by real-time RT-PCR and RT-PCR/MALDI-TOF Methods AID - 10.1101/2021.03.11.21253234 DP - 2021 Jan 01 TA - medRxiv PG - 2021.03.11.21253234 4099 - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2021/03/16/2021.03.11.21253234.short 4100 - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2021/03/16/2021.03.11.21253234.full AB - The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has accelerated the need for rapid implementation of diagnostic assays for detection of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2) in respiratory specimens. While multiple molecular methods utilize nasopharyngeal specimens, supply chain constraints and need for easier and safer specimen collection warrant alternative specimen types, particularly saliva. Although saliva has been found to be a comparable clinical matrix for detection of SARS-CoV-2, evaluations of diagnostic and analytic performance across platforms for this specimen type are limited. Here, we compared two methods for SARS-CoV-2 detection in saliva: the Roche cobas® 6800/8800 SARS-CoV-2 real-time RT-PCR Test and the Agena Biosciences MassARRAY® SARS-CoV-2 Panel/MassARRAY® System. Overall, both systems had high agreement with one another, and both demonstrated high diagnostic sensitivity and specificity when compared to matched patient upper respiratory specimens. We also evaluated the analytical sensitivity of each platform and determined the limit of detection of the Roche assay was four times lower than that of Agena for saliva specimens (390.6 v. 1,562.5 copies/mL). Furthermore, across individual target components of each assay, T2 and N2 targets had the lowest limits of detection for each platform, respectively. Together, we demonstrate that saliva represents an appropriate specimen for SARS-CoV-2 detection in two technologies that have high agreement and differ in analytical sensitivities overall and across individual component targets. The addition of saliva as an acceptable specimen and understanding the sensitivity for testing on these platforms can further inform public health measures for screening and detection to combat the COVID-19 pandemic.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementNo external funding was provided for this project.Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:Human Research Protection Program at the Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, the study does not meet the definition(s) of human subject research and no IRB review/approval is required.All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesThe manuscript contains all relevant data.