RT Journal Article
SR Electronic
T1 Tocilizumab efficacy in COVID-19 patients is associated with respiratory severity-based stages
JF medRxiv
FD Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press
SP 2021.03.04.21252167
DO 10.1101/2021.03.04.21252167
A1 Alvarez-Mon, Melchor
A1 Asunsolo, Angel
A1 Sanz, José
A1 Muñoz, Benjamin
A1 Arranz-Caso, José Alberto
A1 Mena, Maria Novella
A1 Hernández-Gutiérrez, Cristina
A1 Navarro, Jorge
A1 Lozano Duran, Maria Cristina
A1 Arévalo Serrano, Juan
A1 Henche Sanchez, Rocío
A1 Quiroga, Lara Bravo
A1 Segovia, Julio Flores
A1 Sanchez, Marta Garcia
A1 Garcia, Aida Gutierrez
A1 Pérez, Ana
A1 Herrero, Marta
A1 Plana, Nieves
A1 Troncoso, Daniel
A1 Rackov, Gorjana
A1 Martinez-A, Carlos
A1 Balomenos, Dimitrios
A1 ,
YR 2021
UL http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2021/03/09/2021.03.04.21252167.abstract
AB Background Tocilizumab treatment is investigated, and effectiveness in ICU-admitted COVID-19 patients has been reported. Although controversy exists regarding the efficacy of tocilizumab treatment, it has been suggested that tocilizumab might show positive results depending on patient severity status. We examined an association between tocilizumab and distinct disease severity stages.Methods and Findings From March 3 to March 23 2020, 494 consecutively admitted COVID-19 patients received tocilizumab or standard treatment alone. Data were obtained retrospectively. Clinical respiratory severity (CRS) stages were defined by patient oxygenation status and were also associated to scores of WHO clinical progression scale. We categorized patients in three stages, mild/moderate CRS1 (FiSpO2<0.35; WHO score 5), moderate/severe CRS2 (FiO2=0.5/high flow mask; WHO score 6) and severe/critical CRS3 (FiO2<80%/high flow/prone position or mechanical ventilation; score>6). The primary outcome was the composite of death or ICU admission in patients of stages CRS1, CRS2, and CRS3, as well as in total patients. We also addressed mortality alone in total patients. Kaplan-Maier curves, Cox proportional regression and inverse probability weighting marginal structural models were used. We conducted the study from March 3 to April 7 2020 with broad-ranged severity patients; 167 tocilizumab-treated and 327 untreated. CRS1 patients showed no apparent benefit after treatment, while the risk of the primary outcome was greatly reduced in CRS2 treated participants ((HR=0.22; 95% CI (0.16-0.44)). Moreover, tocilizumab treatment was associated with significantly decreased CRS2 patient proportion that reached the outcome compared to non-treated controls (27.8.0% vs. 65.4%; p<0.001). Severe/critical CRS3 patients, also showed benefit after treatment (HR=0.38; 95% CI (0.16-90)), although not as robust as was that of CRS2 treated individuals. Tocilizumab was associated with reduced outcome risk in total patients (HR=0.42; 95% CI (0.26-0.66)) after CRS adjustment, but not if CRS classification was not accounted as confounding factor (HR=1.19; 95% CI (0.84-1.69)). The outcome of mortality alone upon tocilizumab treatment was significant (HR=0.58; 95% CI (0.35-0.96)) after accounting for CRS classification.Conclusions Tocilizumab treatment is associated with reduced COVID-19 escalation in CRS2 patients, suggesting efficacy in moderate/severe non-ICU-admitted patients. CRS classification could represent an essential confounding factor in evaluating tocilizumab in studies of broad-ranged severity patients.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementThis work was partially supported by grants from the Fondo de Investigacion de la Seguridad Social-Instituto de Salud Carlos III (PI18/01726), Spain. Programa de Actividades de I+D de la Comunidad de Madrid en Biomedicina (B2017/BMD-3804), Madrid, Spain. Instituto de Salud Carlos III CIBER Enfermedades hepaticas y Digestivas, Spain. Agencia Estatal de Investigacion. SAF2016-80803-R. Medicina individualizada traslacional, en inflamacion y cancer. Comunidad de Madrid. B2017/BMD-3804, Spain (to: MAM, CMA and DB). GR holds Juan de la Cierva grant (Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovacion).Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:The study was approved by the institutional review board of the University Hospital Prince of Asturias (HUPA0406/20). All patients provided informed consent before starting treatment.All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesAll data generated and analyzed during this study are included in this article.