PT  - JOURNAL ARTICLE
AU  - Riseberg, Emily
AU  - Melamed, Rachel D.
AU  - James, Katherine A.
AU  - Alderete, Tanya L.
AU  - Corlin, Laura
TI  - Development and application of an evidence-based directed acyclic graph to evaluate the associations between metal mixtures and cardiometabolic outcomes
AID  - 10.1101/2021.03.05.21252993
DP  - 2021 Jan 01
TA  - medRxiv
PG  - 2021.03.05.21252993
4099  - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2021/03/08/2021.03.05.21252993.short
4100  - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2021/03/08/2021.03.05.21252993.full
AB  - Background Exposure to individual metals (and metalloids; hereafter ‘metals’) is associated with adverse cardiometabolic outcomes. Specifying analytic models to assess relationships among metal mixtures and cardiometabolic outcomes requires evidence-based models of the (assumed) causal structures; however, such models have not been previously published.Methods We conducted a systematic literature review to develop an evidence-based directed acyclic graph (DAG) identifying relationships among metals, cardiometabolic health indicators, and potential confounders. To evaluate the consistency of the DAG with data from 1797 participants in the San Luis Valley Diabetes Study (SLVDS; mean age=54 years, 53% women, 48% Hispanic), we tested conditional independence statements suggested by the DAG and by 100 DAGs with the same structure but randomly permuted nodes using linear (continuous outcomes), logistic (dichotomous outcomes), or Bayesian kernel machine regression (BKMR; statements with metal coexposures) models. Based on minimally sufficient adjustment sets identified by the DAG, we specified BKMR models assessing associations between urinary metal mixtures and cardiometabolic outcomes in the SLVDS population.Results Twenty-nine articles met the inclusion criteria for the systematic review. From these articles, we developed an evidence-based DAG with 382 testable conditional independence statements (71% supported by SLVDS data). Only 3% of the DAGs with randomly permuted nodes indicated more agreement with the data than our evidence-based DAG. Applying the evidence-based DAG in a pilot analysis, we did not observe evidence for an association among metal mixtures and cardiometabolic outcomes.Conclusions We developed, tested, and applied an evidence-based approach to analyze associations between metal mixtures and cardiometabolic health.What this study adds We conducted a systematic literature review to develop an evidence-based directed acyclic graph (DAG) of the presumed causal relationship between exposure to metal mixtures and cardiometabolic outcomes. Using real data, we evaluated the testable conditional independence statements. The evidence-based DAG outperformed 97% of DAGs with randomly permuted nodes. We applied the evidence-based DAG to select covariates for a pilot analysis. Environmental Epidemiology readers can (1) plan future research based on our systematic literature review, (2) use our process to evaluate other evidence-based DAGs, and (3) apply the evidence-based covariates sets to further explore relationships between metal mixtures and cardiometabolic health.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementEunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health & Human Development (NICHD) grant number K12HD092535 (Corlin), Tufts University Department of Public Health and Community Medicine (Corlin and Riseberg), Tufts Institute of the Environment (Riseberg), R00ES027853 (Alderete)Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:All the intellectual property and data generated were administered according to policies from the University of Colorado and the NIH, including the NIH Data Sharing Policy and Implementation Guidance of March 5, 2003.All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesThe San Luis Valley Diabetes Study (SLVDS) summary data can be shared with the scientific community in accordance with the SLVDS data sharing plan (which includes Data Use Agreements and anonymizing of data to protect subject confidentiality). Analytic code is available upon reasonable request from the corresponding author.AsarsenicBKMRBayesian kernel machine regressionBMIbody mass indexCADcoronary artery diseaseCdcadmiumCHDcoronary heart diseaseCVDcardiovascular diseaseDAGdirected acyclic graphiAsinorganic arsenicMnmanganeseNHANESNational Health and Nutrition Examination SurveysPADperipheral artery diseaseSLVDSSan Luis Valley Diabetes StudyT2DMtype 2 diabetes mellitusUuraniumWtungsten