PT - JOURNAL ARTICLE AU - Verma, Renu AU - Patil, Sunita AU - Zhang, Nan AU - Moreira, Flora M.F. AU - Vitorio, Marize T. AU - Santos, Andrea da S. AU - Wallace, Ellen AU - Gnanashanmugam, Devasena AU - Persing, David AU - Savic, Rada AU - Croda, Julio AU - Andrews, Jason R. TI - A rapid pharmacogenomic assay to detect <em>NAT2</em> polymorphisms and guide isoniazid dosing for tuberculosis treatment AID - 10.1101/2021.01.17.21249995 DP - 2021 Jan 01 TA - medRxiv PG - 2021.01.17.21249995 4099 - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2021/03/04/2021.01.17.21249995.short 4100 - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2021/03/04/2021.01.17.21249995.full AB - Rationale Standardized weight-based dose of anti-tubercular drugs contributes to a substantial incidence of toxicities, inadequate treatment response, and relapse, in part due to variable drug levels achieved. Single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in the N-acetyltransferase-2 (NAT2) gene explain the majority of interindividual pharmacokinetic variability of isoniazid (INH). However, an obstacle to implementing pharmacogenomic-guided dosing is the lack of a point-of-care assay.Objectives To develop and test a NAT2 classification algorithm, validate its performance in predicting isoniazid clearance, and develop a prototype pharmacogenomic assay.Methods We trained random forest models to predict NAT2 acetylation genotype from unphased SNP data using a global collection of 8,561 phased genomes. We enrolled 48 pulmonary TB patients, performed sparse pharmacokinetic sampling, and tested the acetylator prediction algorithm accuracy against estimated INH clearance. We then developed a cartridge-based multiplex qPCR assay on the GeneXpert platform and assessed its analytical sensitivity on whole blood samples from healthy individuals.Measurements and Main Results With a 5-SNP model trained on two-thirds of the data (n=5,738), out-of-sample acetylation genotype prediction accuracy on the remaining third (n=2,823) was 100%. Among the 48 TB patients, predicted acetylator types were: 27 (56.2%) slow, 16 (33.3%) intermediate and 5 (10.4%) rapid. INH clearance rates were lowest in predicted slow acetylators (median 19.3 L/hr), moderate in intermediate acetylators (median 41.0 L/hr) and highest in fast acetylators (median 46.7 L/hr). The cartridge-based assay accurately detected all allele patterns directly from 25ul of whole blood.Conclusions An automated pharmacogenomic assay on a platform widely used globally for tuberculosis diagnosis could enable personalized dosing of isoniazid.Summary This manuscript describes the development and validation of point-of-care multiplex pharmacogenomic assay to guide personalized dosing of isoniazid for treatment or prevention of tuberculosis.Competing Interest StatementJRA and RV are named co-inventors on a provisional patent (Application number 62/991,477) for a NAT2 pharmacogenomic assayClinical TrialN/AFunding StatementFleXcartridges and technical support for their use were provided by Cepheid. This study was supported by the Institute for Immunity, Transplantation, and Infection and the Department of Medicine at Stanford University.Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:The clinical study was approved by the institutional review boards of the Stanford University School of Medicine and Federal University of Grande Dourados (IRB# 33005)All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesData supporting the findings of this manuscript are available in the Supplementary Information files or from the corresponding author upon request.