RT Journal Article
SR Electronic
T1 A multicentre point prevalence survey of patterns and quality of antibiotic prescribing in Indonesian hospitals
JF medRxiv
FD Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press
SP 2021.03.01.21252506
DO 10.1101/2021.03.01.21252506
A1 Limato, Ralalicia
A1 Nelwan, Erni J.
A1 Mudia, Manzilina
A1 Brabander, Justin de
A1 Guterres, Helio
A1 Enty, Enty
A1 Mauleti, Ifael Y.
A1 Mayasari, Maria
A1 Firmansyah, Iman
A1 Hizrani, May
A1 Hamers, Raph L.
YR 2021
UL http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2021/03/03/2021.03.01.21252506.abstract
AB Background Antibiotic misuse and overuse are a major driver of antimicrobial resistance, but systematic data in Indonesia are scarce.Objectives To evaluate patterns and quality indicators of antibiotic prescribing in six acute-care hospitals in Jakarta, Indonesia.Methods We conducted a hospital-wide point prevalence survey (PPS) between March and August 2019, using Global-PPS and WHO-PPS protocols. The analysis focused on antibacterials for systemic use (antibiotics).Results Of 1602 inpatients, 993 (62.0%) received ≥1 antimicrobials. Of 1666 antimicrobial prescriptions, 1273 (76.4%) were antibiotics. Most common reasons for prescribing were pneumonia (27.7%), skin and soft tissue infections (8.3%), gastrointestinal prophylaxis (7.9%), and gastrointestinal infections (5.4%). The most common indication was community-acquired infection (42.6%), followed by surgical prophylaxis (22.6%), hospital-acquired infection (18.5%), medical prophylaxis (9.6%), unknown (4.6%) and other indications (2.1%). The most prescribed antibiotic classes were third-generation cephalosporins (44.3%), fluoroquinolones (13.5%), carbapenems (7.4%), penicillins with B-lactamase inhibitor (6.8%) and aminoglycosides (6.0%). According to the WHO AWaRe classification, Watch antibiotics accounted for 67.4%, followed by 28.0% Access, 2.4% Reserve, and 2.2% Unclassified. Reason for prescribing, stop/review date and planned duration were poorly documented. Hospital antibiotic guidelines were not available for 28.1% of prescriptions, and guideline compliance was 52.2% (478/915). Parenteral administration was high (85.1%). Targeted (non-empirical) prescriptions comprised 8.1% (44/542) for community-acquired infections and 26.8% (63/235) for hospital-acquired infections.Conclusions Our data indicate a high rate of parenteral, empiric use of broad-spectrum antibiotics in Indonesian hospitals, coupled with poor documentation and guideline adherence. The findings suggest important areas for antimicrobial stewardship interventions.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementThis work was funded by the Wellcome Trust, UK (106680/Z/14/Z).Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:The study was approved by the Research Ethics Committee of the Faculty of Medicine of the University of Indonesia (1364/UN2.F1/ETIK/2018) and the Oxford Tropical Research Ethics Committee (559-18). The requirement for individual patient consent was waived. Permission was obtained from the hospital management or research/medical committee in each participating hospital.All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesAfter publication, the data will be made available to others on reasonable requests to the corresponding author, including a detailed research proposal, study objectives and statistical analysis plan. Deidentified participant data will be provided after written approval from the corresponding author and data contributors.