RT Journal Article
SR Electronic
T1 Control of COVID-19 transmission on an urban university campus during a second wave of the pandemic
JF medRxiv
FD Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press
SP 2021.02.23.21252319
DO 10.1101/2021.02.23.21252319
A1 Hamer, Davidson H.
A1 White, Laura F.
A1 Jenkins, Helen E.
A1 Gill, Christopher J.
A1 Landsberg, Hannah N.
A1 Klapperich, Catherine
A1 Bulekova, Katia
A1 Platt, Judy
A1 Decarie, Linette
A1 Gilmore, Wayne
A1 Pilkington, Megan
A1 McDowell, Trevor L.
A1 Faria, Mark A.
A1 Densmore, Douglas
A1 Landaverde, Lena
A1 Li, Wenrui
A1 Rose, Tom
A1 Burgay, Stephen P.
A1 Miller, Candice
A1 Doucette-Stamm, Lynn
A1 Lockard, Kelly
A1 Elmore, Kenneth
A1 Schroeder, Tracy
A1 Zaia, Ann M.
A1 Kolaczyk, Eric D.
A1 Waters, Gloria
A1 Brown, Robert A.
YR 2021
UL http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2021/03/02/2021.02.23.21252319.abstract
AB Importance The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has severely disrupted United States educational institutions. Given potential adverse financial psychosocial effects of campus closures, many institutions developed strategies to reopen campuses in the fall despite the ongoing threat of COVID-19. Many however opted to have limited campus re-opening in order to minimize potential risk of spread of SARS-CoV-2.Objective To analyze how Boston University (BU) fully reopened its campus in the fall of 2020 and controlled COVID-19 transmission despite worsening transmission in the city of Boston.Design Multi-faceted intervention case study.Setting Large urban university campus.Interventions The BU response included a high-throughput SARS-CoV-2 PCR testing facility with capacity to delivery results in less than 24 hours; routine asymptomatic screening for COVID-19; daily health attestations; compliance monitoring and feedback; robust contact tracing, quarantine and isolation in on campus facilities; face mask use; enhanced hand hygiene; social distancing recommendations; de-densification of classrooms and public places; and enhancement of all building air systems.Main Outcomes and Measures Between August and December 2020, BU conducted >500,000 COVID-19 tests and identified 719 individuals with COVID-19: 496 (69.0%) students, 11 (1.5%) faculty, and 212 (29.5%) staff. Overall, about 1.8% of the BU community tested positive. Of 837 close contacts traced, 86 (10.3%) tested positive for COVID-19. BU contact tracers identified a source of transmission for 51.5% of cases with 55.7% identifying a source outside of BU. Among infected faculty and staff with a known source of infection, the majority reported a transmission source outside of BU (100% for faculty and 79.8% for staff). A BU source was identified by 59.2% of undergraduate students and 39.8% of graduate students; notably no transmission was traced to a classroom setting.Conclusions and Relevance BU was successful in containing COVID-19 transmission on campus while minimizing off campus acquisition of COVID-19 from the greater Boston area. A coordinated strategy of testing, contact tracing, isolation and quarantine, with robust management and oversight, can control COVID-19 transmission, even in an urban university setting.Question Can a multi-faceted approach lead to control of COVID-19 transmission and spread on an urban campus?Findings Despite a second wave of SARS-CoV-2 in the greater Boston area, Boston University was able to minimize outbreaks by means of active surveillance of campus populations, isolation of infected individuals, early, effective contact tracing and quarantine, regular communication, excellent data systems, and strong leadership. Most transmission appeared to occur off campus and there was no evidence of classroom transmission.Meaning Using the main axioms of infection control including frequent testing, vigorous contact tracing, and rapid isolation and quarantine, and a strong leadership structure to ensure nimble decision-making and rapid adaption to emerging data, controlling the transmission and spread of SARS-CoV-2 on an urban campus was feasible despite worsening local transmission during the course of the semester.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementThis was an internally funded project and analysis.Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:The plan for this analysis was reviewed by the Boston University Charles River Campus Institutional Review Board (IRB) and was classified as non-human subjects research. The BU Medical Center IRB reviewed the safe behavior quality improvement project (Supplement 1.17) and determined it to be exempt.All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesA limited data set can be made available upon request if accompanied by an acceptable data analysis plan.