RT Journal Article
SR Electronic
T1 Longitudinal analysis of SARS-CoV-2 seroprevalence using multiple serology platforms
JF medRxiv
FD Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press
SP 2021.02.24.21252340
DO 10.1101/2021.02.24.21252340
A1 Carreño, Juan Manuel
A1 Mendu, Damodara Rao
A1 Simon, Viviana
A1 Shariff, Masood A
A1 Singh, Gagandeep
A1 Menon, Vidya
A1 Krammer, Florian
YR 2021
UL http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2021/02/26/2021.02.24.21252340.abstract
AB Serological tests are important tools helping to determine previous infection with severe acute respiratory disease coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) and to monitor immune responses. The current tests are based on spike (S), the receptor binding domain (RBD), or the nucleoprotein (NP) as substrate. Here, we used samples from a high seroprevalence cohort of health care workers (HCWs) to perform a longitudinal analysis of the antibody responses using three distinct serological assays. 501 serum samples were tested using: a) a research-grade RBD and spike based tandem enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (MS–RBD ELISA, MS-spike ELISA), b) a commercial RBD and spike based tandem ELISA (Kantaro-RBD, -spike), and c) a commercial NP-based chemiluminescent microparticle immunoassay (CMIA, Abbott Architect). Seroprevalence ranged around 28% during the early stage of the pandemic (a: 28.4% positives; b: 28.1%; c: 27.3%). Good correlation was observed between the MS and Kantaro RBD ELISAs and between the MS and Kantaro spike ELISAs. By contrast, modest correlations were observed between the Abbott Architect and both RBD and spike-based assays. A proportion of HCWs (n=178) were sampled again 3-5 months after the first time point. Although antibody levels declined in most of the positive individuals, the overall seroprevalence measured by RBD-spike based assays remained unchanged. However the seroprevalence of NP-reactive antibodies significantly declined. Lastly, we tested six samples of individuals who received two doses of SARS-CoV-2 mRNA vaccine and found that seroconversion was detected by the RBD-spike assays but – of course as expected - not the NP based assay. In summary, our results consolidate the strength of different serological assays to assess the magnitude and duration of antibodies to SARS-CoV-2.Competing Interest StatementThe Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai has filed patent applications relating to SARS-CoV-2 serological assays (the 'Serology Assays') and NDV-based SARS-CoV-2 vaccines which list Florian Krammer (the 'Serology Assays', vaccines) and Viviana Simon ('Serology Assays') as co-inventors. The foundational 'Serology Assay' intellectual property (IP) was licensed by the Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai to commercial entities including Kantaro Biosciences, a company in which Mount Sinai has a financial interest. Kantaro manufactures and markets serologic tests based on the Mount Sinai IP. It is anticipated that the medical school will receive payments related to commercialization of the 'Serology Assay' IP and, as faculty inventors, Drs. Krammer and Simon will be entitled to a portion of these payments. Florian Krammer consulted for Merck, Curevac and Pfizer in the past (before 2020) and is currently consulting for Pfizer, Seqirus and Avimex. The Krammer laboratory is collaborating with Pfizer on animal models of SARS-CoV-2. Funding StatementWork in the Krammer and the Simon laboratories is partially funded by the NIAID Collaborative Influenza Vaccine Innovation Centers (CIVIC) contract 75N93019C00051, NIAID Center of Excellence for Influenza Research and Surveillance (CEIRS, contract # HHSN272201400008C), by the generous support of the JPB Foundation and the Open Philanthropy Project (research grant 2020-215611 (5384); and by anonymous donors. This effort was also supported by the Serological Sciences Network (SeroNet) in part with Federal funds from the National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, under Contract No. 75N91019D00024, Task Order No. 75N91020F00003. The content of this publication does not necessarily reflect the views or policies of the Department of Health and Human Services, nor does mention of trade names, commercial products or organizations imply endorsement by the U.S. Government.Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:The samples used for the longitudinal study, were part of a cross sectional cohort of healthcare workers (HCWs) of the New York City Public Hospital in the South Bronx. This study was approved by the Institutional Review Board (IRB#20-009). Samples from study participants receiving the Pfizer mRNA vaccine were obtained from IRB approved longitudinal observation studies (IRB-16-00791; IRB-20-03374) conducted by the Personalized Virology Initiative (PVI) at the Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai. All participants signed informed consents prior to data and sample collection.All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesData is available from the corresponding authors upon reasonable request.