PT - JOURNAL ARTICLE AU - Arnold, Jason AU - Gao, Catherine A. AU - Malsin, Elizabeth AU - Todd, Kristy AU - Argento, A. Christine AU - Cuttica, Michael AU - Coleman, John M. AU - Wunderink, Richard G. AU - Smith, Sean B. AU - for the NU COVID Investigators TI - Outcomes of Percutaneous Tracheostomy for Patients with SARS-CoV-2 Respiratory Failure AID - 10.1101/2021.02.23.21252231 DP - 2021 Jan 01 TA - medRxiv PG - 2021.02.23.21252231 4099 - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2021/02/25/2021.02.23.21252231.short 4100 - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2021/02/25/2021.02.23.21252231.full AB - Background SARS-CoV-2 can cause severe respiratory failure leading to prolonged mechanical ventilation. Data are just emerging about the practice and outcomes of tracheostomy in these patients. We reviewed our experience with tracheostomies for SARS-CoV-2 at our tertiary-care, urban teaching hospital.Methods We reviewed the demographics, comorbidities, timing of mechanical ventilation, tracheostomy, and ICU and hospital lengths-of-stay (LOS) in SARS-CoV-2 patients who received tracheostomies. Early tracheostomy was considered <14 days of ventilation. Medians with interquartile ranges (IQR) were calculated and compared with Wilcoxon rank sum, Spearman correlation, Kruskal-Wallis, and regression modeling.Results From March 2020 to January 2021, our center had 370 patients intubated for SARS-CoV-2, and 59 (16%) had percutaneous bedside tracheostomy. Median time from intubation to tracheostomy was 19 (IQR 17 – 24) days. Demographics and comorbidities were similar between early and late tracheostomy, but early tracheostomy was associated with shorter ICU LOS and a trend towards shorter ventilation. To date, 34 (58%) of patients have been decannulated, 17 (29%) before hospital discharge; median time to decannulation was 24 (IQR 19-38) days. Decannulated patients were younger (56 vs 69 years), and in regression analysis, pneumothorax was associated was associated with lower decannulation rates (OR 0.05, 95CI 0.01 – 0.37). No providers developed symptoms or tested positive for SARS-CoV-2.Conclusions Tracheostomy is a safe and reasonable procedure for patients with prolonged SARS-CoV-2 respiratory failure. We feel that tracheostomy enhances care for SARS-CoV-2 since early tracheostomy appears associated with shorter duration of critical care, and decannulation rates appear high for survivors.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementNIH U19AI135964-01, Northwestern University's Lung Sciences Training Program 5T32HL076139-14Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:The Northwestern University Institutional Review Board (STU00212283) approved this study.All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesData are available upon reasonable request.