PT  - JOURNAL ARTICLE
AU  - Bansal, Sameer
AU  - Kalpakam, Hariprasad
AU  - Kumar, Ashwin
AU  - Thorbole, Anmol
AU  - Varsha, Amogha
AU  - Mehta, Ravindra M
TI  - Lower respiratory tract sampling via bronchoscopy in COVID-19 ARDS: A focus on microbiology, cellular morphology, cytology and management impact
AID  - 10.1101/2021.02.22.21252201
DP  - 2021 Jan 01
TA  - medRxiv
PG  - 2021.02.22.21252201
4099  - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2021/02/23/2021.02.22.21252201.short
4100  - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2021/02/23/2021.02.22.21252201.full
AB  - Background Lower respiratory tract (LRT) sampling via bronchoscopy has been done sparingly in COVID-19 ARDS due to the high aerosol risk for the health care workers (HCW). Valuable information can be gained by detailed evaluation of bronchoscopic LRT samples.Methods LRT samples were obtained by bedside bronchoscopy performed in suspected or confirmed severe COVID-19 ARDS patients on mechanical ventilation. Only positive cases were included in the study. Microbiological, cellular and cytological studies including LRT COVID-19 RT-PCR were performed and analysed.Results 100 samples were collected from 63 patients, 53 were males (84%). 43 patients (68%) had at least 1 comorbidity. 55% cases had secondary bacterial infection as demonstrated by positive culture. Most of these infections were due to multi-drug resistant organisms (94.5%). The most common organisms were Klebsiella pneumoniae and Acinetobacter baumanii in 56.3% and 14.5% cases respectively. Fungal superinfection was observed in 9 patients (14.3%). Bronchoscopy helped confirm COVID-19 diagnosis in 1 patient and helped rule out COVID-19 in 3 patients who were eventually excluded from the study. The median BAL fluid (BALF) WBC count was 953 (IQR; 400-2717), with mean neutrophil count 85.2% (±13.9), and mean lymphocyte count 14.8% (±13.9). Repeat sampling done in some patients showed a progressive increase in the total WBC count in BALF, an increase in neutrophil percentage, and a higher chance of isolating an organism on the culture (81% repeat procedures were culture positive). The rate of super-infection increased with longer duration of illness. Patients with superinfection also had an increased WBC count (1001 vs 400), and lower lymphocyte percentage (19% vs 12% - OR - 6.8 [95%CI −14.3 − 0.7]). Bronchoscopic LRT sampling contributed significantly to modifying antibiotic coverage and discontinuing steroids in 37% cases.Conclusion This study describes a detailed analysis of bronchoscopic LRT sampling in critically ill COVID-19 patients. This provided important basic and applied information augmenting disease understanding and contributing to clinical management when there was scant information available in the pandemic.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementNo external funding was receivedAuthor DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:Institutional Ethics Committee (IEC) - Biomedical Research (BMR) of Apollo Hospitals, Bangalore. The committee is constituted and approved as per ICH-GCP, national ethical guidelines for Biomedical and Health Research involving human participants (Indian Council of Medical Research 2017) and new drugs and clinical trial rules march 2019. The study was approved by this committee: Application No: AHB-BMR-004/09-20 Approval letter date 30/9/2020All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesAll data is available for review