RT Journal Article
SR Electronic
T1 Estimating VO<sub>2peak</sub> in 18-91 year-old adults: <em>Development and Validation of the FitMáx<sup>©</sup> - Questionnaire</em>
JF medRxiv
FD Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press
SP 2021.02.21.21249668
DO 10.1101/2021.02.21.21249668
A1 Meijer, Renske
A1 Hooff, Martijn van
A1 Papen-Botterhuis, Nicole E.
A1 Molenaar, Charlotte J.L.
A1 Regis, Marta
A1 Timmers, Thomas
A1 van de Poll-Franse, Lonneke V.
A1 Savelberg, Hans H.C.M.
A1 Schep, Goof
YR 2021
UL http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2021/02/23/2021.02.21.21249668.abstract
AB Objectives Cardiorespiratory fitness plays an essential role in health outcomes and quality of life. Objective assessment of cardiorespiratory fitness is costly, labour intensive and not widely available. Although patient-reported outcome measures estimate cardiorespiratory fitness more cost-efficiently, the current questionnaires lack accuracy. The aim of this study is to develop and validate the FitMáx©-questionnaire, a self-reported questionnaire to estimate cardiorespiratory fitness in healthcare.Methods We developed the FitMáx©-questionnaire, consisting of three questions assessing walking, stair climbing, and cycling capacity. A comparison on estimating VO2peak was made with the Duke Activity Status Index (DASI), Veterans Specific Activity Questionnaire (VSAQ) and cardiopulmonary exercise testing as the gold standard. A total of 716 patients and athletes (520 men, 196 women) aged 18□91 performed a CPET in our hospital. We randomly selected 70% of the subjects to fit a linear regression model to estimate VO2peak based on the FitMáx© scores. The remaining 30% of participants was used for validation of this model.Results The VO2peak estimated by the FitMáx© strongly correlates with the VO2peak measured objectively with CPET; r=0.95 (0.93□0.96) SEE=3.94 ml·kg-1·min-1. Bias between predicted and measured VO2peak was 0.32 ml·kg-1·min-1 and the 95% limits of agreement were −8.11 □ 9.40 ml·kg-1·min-1. In our sample, the FitMáx scored superiorly on correlation and SEE compared with those from the DASI and VSAQ, r=0.80 (0.73□0.86) SEE=4.22 ml·kg-1·min-1 and r=0.88 (0.84□0.91) SEE=6.61 ml·kg-1·min-1, respectively.Conclusion FitMáx© is a valid and accessible questionnaire to estimate cardiorespiratory fitness expressed as VO2peak and shows substantial improvement compared to currently used questionnaires.Key pointsFitMáx© relies on three simple single-answer questions, which are recognizable for a large population, to accurately estimate cardiorespiratory fitness.The FitMáx© is a self-reported instrument in which involvement of physicians, healthcare providers or other instrumentation is not necessary.Cardiorespiratory fitness estimated by the FitMáx© may serve as an easily applicable measure in clinical and non-clinical settings.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Clinical TrialNL8568Funding StatementThe study was partially funded by Stichting SOS and the National Foundation Against Cancer.Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:The authorized Medical Research Ethics Committee of MMC issued a non WMO acknowledgement for this study (reference number N18.051). The study was registered as NL8568 in the Netherlands Trial Register. https://www.trialregister.nl/trial/8568All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesThe datasets generated during and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.