RT Journal Article
SR Electronic
T1 Regulatory-approved Deep Learning/Machine Learning-Based Medical Devices in Japan as of 2020: A Systematic Review
JF medRxiv
FD Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press
SP 2021.02.19.21252031
DO 10.1101/2021.02.19.21252031
A1 Aisu, Nao
A1 Miyake, Masahiro
A1 Takeshita, Kohei
A1 Akiyama, Masato
A1 Kawasaki, Ryo
A1 Kashiwagi, Kenji
A1 Sakamoto, Taiji
A1 Oshika, Tetsuro
A1 Tsujikawa, Akitaka
YR 2021
UL http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2021/02/23/2021.02.19.21252031.abstract
AB Machine learning (ML) and deep learning (DL) are changing the world and reshaping the medical field. Thus, we conducted a systematic review to determine the status of regulatory-approved ML/DL-based medical devices in Japan, a leading stakeholder in international regulatory harmonization. Information about the medical devices were obtained from the Japan Association for the Advancement of Medical Equipment search service. The usage of ML/DL methodology in the medical devices was confirmed using public announcements or by contacting the marketing authorization holders via e-mail when the public announcements were insufficient for confirmation. Among the 114,150 medical devices found, 11 were regulatory-approved ML/DL-based Software as a Medical Device (SaMD), with 6 products (54.5%) related to radiology and 5 products (45.5%) related to gastroenterology. The domestic ML/DL-based SaMD were mostly related to health check-ups, which are common in Japan. Our review provides a global overview that can foster international competitiveness and further tailored advancements.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Clinical TrialBecause this is a systematic reviewFunding StatementThis research was supported by AMED under Grant Number JP20vk0124003. This research was also supported by MHLW ICT infrastructure establishment and implementation of artificial intelligence for clinical and medical research program, Grant Number JP20AC0201.Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:This is a systematic review which targeted on the approval status of medical devices. Therefore, this study was exempted from IRB review/approval.All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesData that support the findings of this study are available in the JAMME search repository, https://search.jaame.or.jp/jaames/login.php https://search.jaame.or.jp/jaames/login.php