PT - JOURNAL ARTICLE AU - Ren, A AU - Sohaei, D AU - Zacharioudakis, I AU - Sigal, GB AU - Stengelin, M AU - Mathew, A AU - Campbell, C AU - Padmanabhan, N AU - Romero, D AU - Joe, J AU - Soosaipillai, A AU - Kulasingam, V AU - Mazzulli, T AU - Li, XA AU - McGeer, A AU - Diamandis, EP AU - Prassas, I TI - Ultrasensitive assay for saliva-based SARS-CoV-2 antigen detection AID - 10.1101/2021.02.17.21251863 DP - 2021 Jan 01 TA - medRxiv PG - 2021.02.17.21251863 4099 - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2021/02/19/2021.02.17.21251863.short 4100 - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2021/02/19/2021.02.17.21251863.full AB - Widespread SARS-CoV-2 testing is highly valuable for identifying asymptomatic/pre-symptomatic individuals to slow community disease transmission. However, there remains a technological gap for highly reliable, easy, and quick SARS-CoV-2 diagnostic tests that are suitable for frequent mass testing. Compared to the conventional nasopharyngeal (NP) swab-based tests, saliva-based methods are attractive due to easier and safer sampling protocols. Despite its merits in rapid turn-around-time and high throughput compared to traditional PCR-based technologies, the widespread use of saliva-based SARS-CoV-2 rapid antigen tests is hindered by limited analytical sensitivity of current methods. Here, we report the first ultrasensitive, saliva-based SARS-CoV-2 antigen assay with an analytical sensitivity of < 0.32 pg/ml, corresponding to 4 viral RNA copies/µl, which is comparable to that of PCR-based tests. Using the novel electrochemiluminescence (ECL)-based S-PLEX immunoassay, we measured the SARS-CoV-2 nucleocapsid (N) antigen concentration in 105 saliva samples obtained from non-COVID-19 and COVID-19 patients. Our assay displayed absolute specificity and high sensitivity (90.2%), where it correctly identified samples with viral loads up to 35 CT cycles by saliva-based PCR. Paired NP swab-based PCR results were also obtained for 86 cases for comparison. Our assay showed high concordance with saliva-based and NP swab-based PCR in samples with negative (< 0.32 pg/ml) and strongly positive (> 2 pg/ml) N antigen concentrations. Our study unveiled the ultrasensitivity and specificity of the saliva-based S-PLEX assay, demonstrating its clinical value as a high throughput, complementary alternative to PCR-based techniques. The novel technique is especially valuable in cases where compliance to frequent swabbing may be problematic (e.g. schools, nursing homes, etc.).Competing Interest StatementRen A, Sohaei D, Zacharioudakis I, Soosaipillai A, Kulasingam V, Mazzulli T, Li XA, McGeer A, Diamandis EP and Prassas I do not have anything to declare. Sigal GB, Stengelin M, Mathew A, Campbell C, Padmanabhan N, Romero D, and Joe J are employees at Meso Scale Diagnostics (Rockville, MD, USA).Funding StatementThis study was funded by the Mount Sinai Hospital foundation.Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:All collected saliva specimens were obtained under approval of the Sinai Health System Research Ethics Board (REB#: 02-0118U).All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesThe datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.