PT  - JOURNAL ARTICLE
AU  - Sharma, Neeraj
AU  - Bairwa, Mohan
AU  - Gupta, S. D.
AU  - Mangal, D. K.
TI  - Pattern of Severity of Road Traffic Injuries Among Pedestrians in Low- and Middle-Income Countries: A Systematic Review
AID  - 10.1101/2021.02.13.21251689
DP  - 2021 Jan 01
TA  - medRxiv
PG  - 2021.02.13.21251689
4099  - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2021/02/16/2021.02.13.21251689.short
4100  - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2021/02/16/2021.02.13.21251689.full
AB  - Background Low-and middle-income countries (LMICs) contribute about 93 per cent of road traffic injuries (RTIs) and deaths worldwide with a significant proportion of pedestrians (22 per cent). Various scales are used to assess the pattern of injury severity, which are useful in predicting the outcomes of RTIs. We conducted this systematic review to determine the pattern of RTI severity among pedestrians in LMICs.Methods We searched the electronic databases PubMed, CINHAL, CENTRAL, Web of Science, Scopus, EMBASE, ProQuest and SciELO, and examined the references of the selected studies. Original research articles published on the RTI severity among pedestrians in LMICs during 1997-2016 were eligible for this review. Quality of publications was assessed using an adapted Newcastle-Ottawa Scale of observational studies. Findings of this study were presented as a meta-summary.Results Five articles from 3 LMICs were eligible for the systematic review. Abbreviated Injury Score, Glasgow Coma Scale and Maxillofacial Injury Severity Score were used to assess the injury severity in the selected studies. In a multicentric study from China (2013), 21, 38 and 19 per cent pedestrians with head injuries had AIS scores 1-2, 3-4 and 5-6, respectively. In another study from China (2010), the proportion of AIS score 1-2 and AIS score 3 and above (serious to un-survivable) injuries occurred due to crash with sedan cars were 65 and 35 per cent, respectively. Such injuries due to minivan crashes were 49.5 per cent and 50.5 per cent, respectively. Two studies Ikeja, Nigeria (2014) and Elazig, Turkey (2009) presented, 24.5 and 32.5 per cent injured had a severe head injury (GCS < 8), respectively. In another study from Ibadan, Nigeria (2014), the severe maxillofacial injuries were seen in the victims of car/minibus pedestrian crashes 46 per cent, and 17 per cent had a fatal outcome.Conclusion A varied percent of pedestrians (24.5 to 57 percent) had road traffic injuries of serious to fatal nature, depending on type of collision and injury severity scale. This study pressed the need to conduct studies with a robust methodology on the pattern of RTI severity among pedestrians to guide the programme managers, researchers and policymakers in LMICs to formulate the policies and programmes to save the pedestrian lives.African relevancePrior RTI research reveals that pedestrians and cyclists were at the highest risk of fatality of in Sub-Saharan Africa, whereas motorcyclists had significantly higher fatality rates in Asian countries such as Malaysia and Thailand (1–3).Fifty-seven type of injury severity scoring systems have been developed to assess the injury severity for triage and timely decision making for patient treatment need, outcome prediction, quality of trauma care, and epidemiological research and evaluation (4,5).We found two studies from sub-Saharan Africa in this review which showed that severe pedestrian injuries ranged from 24.5 to 46 per cent of total pedestrian RTIs.Despite the findings of review affected by limited and variegated sample, it could be useful to guide for future research.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementThis research received no specific grant from any funding agency in the public, commercial or not-for-profit sectors.Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:This systematic review does not require ethical clearance as it used secondary data which is already in the public domain. In addition, this study has not used any unit-level data.All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesAll data generated or analyzed during this study are included in this published article [and its supplementary information files].AISAbbreviated Injury ScaleASCOTA Severity Characteristics of TraumaCINHALCumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health LiteratureDALYsDisability Adjusted Life YearsEMBASEExcerpta Medica dataBASEGCSGlasgow Coma ScaleGDPGross Domestic ProductsICISSInternational Classification of Diseases 9 based injury severity scoreISSInjury Severity ScoreLMICsLow- and Middle-Income CountriesMFISSMaxillo-Facial Injury Severity ScoreMOOSEMeta-analysis Of Observational Studies in EpidemiologyNISSNew Injury Severity ScorePRISMAPreferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-AnalysesPROSPEROProspective Register of Systematic ReviewsRTIRoad Traffic InjurySciELOScientific Electronic Library OnlineTRISSTrauma and Injury Severity Score