PT  - JOURNAL ARTICLE
AU  - Filho, Carlos Izaias Sartorão
AU  - Neto, Carlos Izaias Sartorão
AU  - Guazelli, Carla Fabiana Souza
AU  - Avello, Camila Rodrigues
AU  - Rodrigues, Ivana Geraldeli Neiva
AU  - Alvarez, Luana Durante
AU  - de Souza Reis, Fabiana Vieira Duarte
AU  - Patrícia Fagundes, Vanessa
AU  - Takano, Luiz
AU  - Prudêncio, Caroline Baldini
AU  - Barbosa, Angélica Mércia Pascon
AU  - Rudge, Marilza Vieira Cunha
TI  - Evaluation of the Knowledge of University Students in the Health Area About Sexually Transmitted Infections: A Cross-Sectional Study
AID  - 10.1101/2021.02.11.21250842
DP  - 2021 Jan 01
TA  - medRxiv
PG  - 2021.02.11.21250842
4099  - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2021/02/13/2021.02.11.21250842.short
4100  - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2021/02/13/2021.02.11.21250842.full
AB  - Introduction Sexually transmitted infections (STI) have consequences that negatively affect the population’s quality of life and health. Young adults are susceptible to low access to preventive measures and a greater risk behavior risk. The objective was to evaluate and compare STI’ Knowledge in university students from health courses, a public institution, and a private institution of higher education in Brazil.Methods a cross-sectional study conducted in 2019 in Brazil at the FEMA School of Medicine in Assis-SP and the University of the State of São Paulo (UNESP) in Marília in the courses of Physiotherapy, Speech Therapy, and Occupational Therapy, in undergraduate students, over 18 years of age, through a self-applied questionnaire translated and adapted to the Brazilian Portuguese from the STD-KQ – Transmitted Disease Knowledge Questionnaire.Results 462/700 students participated (66.66%) 18-46 years of age (mean 21.46 years, +/− 3.61), 99 men and 363 women. In the private institution, 262/340 (77.06%), and in the public institution, 200/360 (55.55%). The mean age was 22.21 (+/− 4.21) years among men and 21.25 (+/− 3.41) years among women. The mean percentage of the 28 test questions’ correct answers was 52.07%. The average number of correct responses per student was 17.49 out of 28 possible, 62% (+/− 4.97). The distribution between the groups was normal. In the multiple linear regression model for the percentage of correct answers, adjusted for the confounding variables, the intercept was 55.2. The students of the private institution answered 19,655 questions more than the public one (P<.001), and for each semester of graduation, the students answered 1,628 more questions (P<.001). There were no relevant differences regarding the gender and age of the students.Conclusion there are gaps in STI knowledge among university students in the health area. The students of the first semesters of the courses, and, in particular, students from a public educational institution, had a significantly lower performance of the right in the questionnaire applied. Thus, actions to promote STI knowledge and preventive attitudes are necessary among university students.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Clinical TrialEDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION OF MUNICIPALITY OF ASSIS ETHICAL COMITTEE APPROVAL NUMBER 13034619.0.0000.8547Funding StatementNo external funding was receivedAuthor DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:The EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION OF MUNICIPALITY OF ASSIS Research Ethics Committee (certificate number: 13034619.0.0000.8547) previously approved the study.All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesData availability statement: we declare that all data referred to in the manuscript can be available under request. https://www.dropbox.com/s/6htpbib2d2h0kuw/ISTpreprint.docx?dl=0