RT Journal Article
SR Electronic
T1 SARS-CoV-2 Transmission Risk from sports Equipment (STRIKE)
JF medRxiv
FD Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press
SP 2021.02.04.21251127
DO 10.1101/2021.02.04.21251127
A1 Edwards, Thomas
A1 Kay, Grant A
A1 Aljayyoussi, Ghaith
A1 Owen, Sophie I
A1 Harland, Andy R
A1 Pierce, Nicholas S
A1 Calder, James D F
A1 Fletcher, Tom E
A1 Adams, Emily R
YR 2021
UL http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2021/02/08/2021.02.04.21251127.abstract
AB OBJECTIVES To investigate the potential of shared sporting equipment as transmission vectors of SARS-CoV-2 during the reintroduction of sports such as soccer, rugby, cricket, tennis, golf and gymnastics.SETTING Laboratory based live SARS-CoV-2 virus studyINTERVENTIONS Ten different types of sporting equipment were inoculated with 40μl droplets containing clinically relevant high and low concentrations of live SARS-CoV-2 virus. Materials were then swabbed at time points relevant to sports (1, 5, 15, 30, 90 minutes). The amount of live SARS-CoV-2 recovered at each time point was enumerated using viral plaque assays, and viral decay and half-life was estimated through fitting linear models to log transformed data from each material.MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE The primary outcome measure was quantification of retrievable SARS-CoV-2 virus from each piece of equipment at pre-determined time points.RESULTS At one minute, SARS-CoV-2 virus was recovered in only seven of the ten types of equipment with the low dose inoculum, one at five minutes and none at 15 minutes. Retrievable virus dropped significantly for all materials tested using the high dose inoculum with mean recovery of virus falling to 0.74% at 1 minute, 0.39% at 15 minutes and 0.003% at 90 minutes. Viral recovery, predicted decay, and half-life varied between materials with porous surfaces limiting virus transmission.CONCLUSIONS This study shows that there is an exponential reduction in SARS-CoV-2 recoverable from a range of sports equipment after a short time period, and virus is less transferrable from materials such as a tennis ball, red cricket ball and cricket glove. Given this rapid loss of viral load and the fact that transmission requires a significant inoculum to be transferred from equipment to the mucous membranes of another individual it seems unlikely that sports equipment is a major cause for transmission of SARS-CoV-2. These findings have important policy implications in the context of the pandemic and may promote other infection control measures in sports to reduce the risk of SARS-CoV-2 transmission and urge sports equipment manufacturers to identify surfaces that may or may not be likely to retain transferable virus.WHAT IS ALREADY KNOWN ON THIS TOPICWHAT IS ALREADY KNOWN ON THIS TOPICTransmission of SARS-CoV-2 between individuals playing sport may be via respiratory droplets when in close proximity to an infected person.SARS-CoV-2 remains viable on a variety of surfaces resulting in recommendations to reduce the sharing of sports equipment such as tennis balls when sports were re-opened.WHAT THIS STUDY ADDSWHAT THIS STUDY ADDSThe recoverable SARS-CoV-2 viral load reduces exponentially with mean viral load of all materials less than 1% of the original inoculum after 1 minute.The type of material has a significant effect on SARS-CoV-2 transfer, with less virus transferred from porous materials such as bovine leather or nylon woven cloth.Policies on infection control measures in sport may be better directed towards areas other than reducing the sharing of sports equipment.Sports equipment manufacturers may consider using materials that absorb or retain virus as a way of reducing viral transmission from sports equipment.Competing Interest StatementNSP is employed in part by the England and Wales Cricket Board. All other authors declare no competing interests.Funding StatementThe study was funded by philanthropic donations and contributions from the UK National Governing Bodies of Sport. The funders had no input into the design, interpretation or reporting of the study.Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:This was a laboratory study and required no ethical approvalAll necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesData is available from the authors upon request