PT  - JOURNAL ARTICLE
AU  - Oliphant, Nicholas P
AU  - Ray, Nicolas
AU  - Bensaid, Khaled
AU  - Ouedraogo, Adama
AU  - Gali, Asma Yaroh
AU  - Habi, Oumarou
AU  - Maazou, Ibhrahim
AU  - Panciera, Rocco
AU  - Muñiz, Maria
AU  - Manda, Samuel OM
AU  - Sy, Zeynabou
AU  - Jackson, Debra
AU  - Doherty, Tanya
TI  - Toward a geography of community health workers in Niger: a geospatial analysis
AID  - 10.1101/2021.02.02.21250043
DP  - 2021 Jan 01
TA  - medRxiv
PG  - 2021.02.02.21250043
4099  - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2021/02/03/2021.02.02.21250043.short
4100  - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2021/02/03/2021.02.02.21250043.full
AB  - Background Little is known about the geography of community health workers (CHWs), their contribution to geographical accessibility of primary health care (PHC) services, and strategies for optimizing efficiency of CHW deployment in the context of universal health coverage (UHC).Methods Using a complete georeferenced census of front-line health facilities and CHWs in Niger and other high resolution spatial datasets, we modelled travel times to front-line health facilities and CHWs between 2000-2013, accounting for training, essential commodities, and maximum population capacity. We estimated additional CHWs needed to maximize geographical accessibility of the population beyond the reach of existing front-line health facilities and CHWs. We assessed the efficiency of geographical targeting of the existing CHW network compared to modelled CHW networks designed to optimize geographical targeting of the estimated population, under-five deaths, and plasmodium falciparum malaria cases.Results The percent of the population within 60 minutes walking to the nearest CHW increased from 0·0% to 17·5% between 2000-2013, with 15·5% within 60 minutes walking to the nearest CHW trained on integrated community case management (iCCM) – making PHC services and iCCM, specifically, geographically accessible for an estimated 2·3 million and 2·0 million additional people, respectively. An estimated 10·4 million people (59·0%) remained beyond a 60-minute catchment of front-line health facilities and CHWs. Optimal deployment of 8064 additional CHWs could increase geographic coverage of the estimated total population from 41·5% to 73·6%. Geographical targeting of the existing CHW network was inefficient but optimized CHW networks could improve efficiency by 55·0%-81·9%, depending on targeting metric.Interpretations We provide the first high-resolution maps and estimates of geographical accessibility to CHWs at national scale, highlighting improvements between 2000-2013 in Niger, geographies where gaps remained, approaches for improving targeting, and the importance of putting CHWs on the map to inform planning in the context of UHC.KEY QUESTIONSWhat is already known?What is already known?Previous studies have estimated geographical accessibility (as travel time) to CHWs for subnational areas only1-4 and have assessed efficiency of the distribution of hospitals in low and middle-income countries.5What are the new findings?What are the new findings?The percent of the population within 60 minutes walking to the nearest CHW increased from 0·0% to 17·5% between 2000-2013, with 15·5% within 60 minutes walking to the nearest CHW trained on integrated community case management (iCCM) – making PHC services and iCCM, specifically, geographically accessible for an estimated 2·3 million and 2·0 million additional people, respectively.An estimated 10·4 million people (59·0%) remained beyond a 60-minute catchment of front-line health facilities and CHWs in 2013, with important variation across subnational geographies, training of CHWs, and availability of essential commodities.Optimal deployment of 8064 additional CHWs could increase geographic coverage of the estimated total population from 41·5% to 73·6%, providing physical access to PHC services for an additional 5·7 million people not covered in 2013.Optimized CHW networks increased efficiency of geographical targeting compared to the existing CHW network by 55·0%-81·9%, depending on targeting metric.What do the new findings imply?What do the new findings imply?Geographical accessibility to primary health care services, including iCCM, improved in Niger between 2000-2013 with important contributions by CHWs.Gaps in geographical accessibility remained as of 2013 but scale-up of the CHW network, using the scale-up approach described in this study, could substantially increase geographical accessibility of PHC services.The efficiency of geographical targeting of the existing network of CHWs was suboptimal. The approach for optimizing efficiency of geographical targeting described in this study could be used to improve geographical targeting of CHW deployment in Niger and other countries.This work is a first step toward establishing a geography of CHWs in Niger and is a call to action to put CHWs on the map globally to inform health system planning and maximize geographical accessibility, efficiency, and impact of investments in the context of UHC.Competing Interest StatementMr. Oliphant reports grants (salary support) from Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation (BMGF), outside the submitted work.Funding StatementNo funding was provided.Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:The study was approved by the Senate Research Committee of the University of Western Cape. Registration number 15/7/271.All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesData are available on a public, open access repository under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Unported (CC BY 4.0) license, which permits others to copy, redistribute, remix, transform and build upon this work for any purpose, provided the original work is properly cited, a link to the license is given, and indication of whether changes were made. See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. Supplementary Appendices 2-6, Videos 1-2, and all model outputs are available in Supplementary Appendix 1b at https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4482969. All model inputs (except existing service delivery locations) are available in Supplementary Appendix 1c at https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.13536779.v5. Health service delivery location data are only available through data sharing agreements with UNICEF and the Ministry of Public Health of Niger. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4482969 https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.13536779.v5