RT Journal Article
SR Electronic
T1 Wastewater surveillance for SARS-CoV-2 on college campuses: Initial efforts, lessons learned and research needs
JF medRxiv
FD Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press
SP 2021.02.01.21250952
DO 10.1101/2021.02.01.21250952
A1 Harris-Lovett, Sasha
A1 Nelson, Kara
A1 Beamer, Paloma
A1 Bischel, Heather N.
A1 Bivins, Aaron
A1 Bruder, Andrea
A1 Butler, Caitlyn
A1 Camenisch, Todd D.
A1 Long, Susan K. De
A1 Karthikeyan, Smruthi
A1 Larsen, David A.
A1 Meierdiercks, Katherine
A1 Mouser, Paula
A1 Pagsuyoin, Sheree
A1 Prasek, Sarah
A1 Radniecki, Tyler S.
A1 Ram, Jeffrey L.
A1 Roper, D. Keith
A1 Safford, Hannah
A1 Sherchan, Samendra P.
A1 Shuster, William
A1 Stalder, Thibault
A1 Wheeler, Robert T.
A1 Korfmacher, Katrina Smith
YR 2021
UL http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2021/02/03/2021.02.01.21250952.abstract
AB Background Wastewater surveillance for SARS-CoV-2 is an emerging approach to help identify the risk of a COVID-19 outbreak. This tool can contribute to public health surveillance at both community (wastewater treatment system) and institutional (e.g., colleges, prisons, nursing homes) scales.Objectives This research aims to understand the successes, challenges, and lessons learned from initial wastewater surveillance efforts at colleges and university systems to inform future research, development and implementation.Methods This paper presents the experiences of 25 college and university systems in the United States that monitored campus wastewater for SARS-CoV-2 during the fall 2020 academic period. We describe the broad range of approaches, findings, resource needs, and lessons learned from these initial efforts. These institutions range in size, social and political geographies, and include both public and private institutions.Discussion Our analysis suggests that wastewater monitoring at colleges requires consideration of information needs, local sewage infrastructure, resources for sampling and analysis, college and community dynamics, approaches to interpretation and communication of results, and follow-up actions. Most colleges reported that a learning process of experimentation, evaluation, and adaptation was key to progress. This process requires ongoing collaboration among diverse stakeholders including decision-makers, researchers, faculty, facilities staff, students, and community members.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementFor work on this project, Dr. Korfmacher was supported in part by the National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences grant P30 ES001247 and Dr. Harris-Lovett was supported in part by the Catena Foundation.Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:Approved by the University of California, Berkeley IRB, CPHS number 2020-11-13796.All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).Yes I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesThe interview transcripts used for the research contain identifying information and are not available to the public.