PT - JOURNAL ARTICLE AU - Leister, Iris AU - Ponocny-Seliger, Elisabeth AU - Kollaritsch, Herwig AU - Dungel, Peter AU - Holzer, Barbara AU - Grillari, Johannes AU - Redl, Heinz AU - Ponocny, Ivo AU - Wilfing, Claudia AU - Aigner, Ludwig AU - Exner, Markus AU - Stainer, Michaela AU - Hackl, Matthias AU - Hausner, Thomas AU - Mittermayr, Rainer AU - Schaden, Wolfgang TI - Antibody seroprevalence and rate of asymptomatic infections with SARS-CoV-2 in Austrian hospital personnel AID - 10.1101/2021.02.01.21250898 DP - 2021 Jan 01 TA - medRxiv PG - 2021.02.01.21250898 4099 - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2021/02/03/2021.02.01.21250898.short 4100 - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2021/02/03/2021.02.01.21250898.full AB - Context On March 11, the World Health Organization (WHO) announced the current corona virus disease 2019 (COVID-19) outbreak as a pandemic. The first laboratory-confirmed case of COVID-19 in Austria was announced on February 27, 2020. Since then, the incidence of infection followed an exponential increase until a complete lockdown in March 2020. Thereafter easing of restrictions was gradually introduced and until mid-August daily infections remained mostly below 5 per 100.000 population.Objectives The aims of this study are to determine i) how many employees in Austrian trauma hospitals and rehabilitation facilities have virus specific IgG and IgM, and/or neutralizing antibodies against SARS-CoV-2, ii) how many are active virus carriers (symptomatic and asymptomatic) during the study, iii) the antibody decline in seropositive subjects over a period of around six months, and iv) the utility of rapid antibody tests for outpatient screening.Study Design Open uncontrolled observational cross-sectional study.Setting/Participants A total of 3301 employees in 11 Austrian trauma hospitals and rehabilitation facilities of the Austrian Social Insurance for Occupational Risks (AUVA) participated in the study.Study Interventions and Measures Rapid antibody tests for SARS-CoV-2 specific IgG and IgM antibodies, and RT-PCR tests based on oropharyngeal swab samples, as well as laboratory-based antibody tests using ELISA/PRNT were performed. The tests were conducted twice, with an interval of 42.4±7.7 (Min=30, Max=64) days. Additionally, participants filled out a questionnaire including questions related to personal health, traveling activities, living situation, as well as inquiries of symptoms and comorbidities. Antibody positive tested participants were re-tested with ELISA/PRNT tests at a third time point on average 188.0±12.8 days after their initial test.Results In our study cohort, only 27 out of 3301 participants (0.81%) had a positive antibody test at any time point during the study confirmed via neutralization test. Among participants who had positive test results in either of the antibody tests, 50.4% did not report any symptoms consistent with common manifestations of COVID-19 during the study period or within the preceding six weeks. In the group who tested positive during or prior to study inclusion the most common symptoms of an acute viral illness were rhinitis (21.9%), and loss of taste and olfactory sense (21.9%).The rapid antibody test was generally more sensitive based on serum (sensitivity=86.6%) as compared to whole blood (sensitivity=65.4). Concerning both ELISA tests overall the Roche test detected 24 (sensitivity=88.9%) and the Diasorin test 22 positive participants (sensitivity=81.5%).In participants with a positive PRNT, a significant decrease in PRNT concentration from 31.8±22.9 (Md=32.0) at T1 to 26.1±17.6 (Md=21.3) at T2 to 21.4±13.4 (Md=16.0) at T3 (χ2=23.848, df=2, p<0.001) was observed (χ2=23.848, df=2, p<0.001) – with an average time of 42.4±7.7 days between T1 and T2 and 146.9±13.8 days between T2 and T3.Conclusions During the study period (May 11th – December 21th) only 0.81% were tested positive for antibodies in our study cohort. The antibody concentration decreases significantly over time with 14.8% (4 out of 27) losing detectable antibodies.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Clinical TrialNCT04354779Funding StatementThe project was funded by the Austrian Social Insurance for Occupational Risks (AUVA).Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:The study was approved by the ethics committee of the Austrian social insurance for occupational risks (AUVA) (Vote No. 04/2020).All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesData can be made available upon reasonable request to the corresponding author.