RT Journal Article
SR Electronic
T1 Lack of trust and social media echo chambers predict COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy
JF medRxiv
FD Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press
SP 2021.01.26.21250246
DO 10.1101/2021.01.26.21250246
A1 Jennings, Will
A1 Stoker, Gerry
A1 Willis, Hannah
A1 Valgardsson, Viktor
A1 Gaskell, Jen
A1 Devine, Daniel
A1 McKay, Lawrence
A1 Mills, Melinda C.
YR 2021
UL http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2021/01/27/2021.01.26.21250246.abstract
AB As COVID-19 vaccines are rolled out across the world, there are growing concerns about the role that trust, belief in conspiracy theories and spread of misinformation through social media impact vaccine hesitancy. We use a nationally representative survey of 1,476 adults in the UK between December 12 to 18, 2020 and five focus groups conducted in the same period. Trust is a core predictor, with distrust in vaccines in general and mistrust in government raising vaccine hesitancy. Trust in health institutions and experts and perceived personal threat are vital, with focus groups revealing that COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy is driven by a misunderstanding of herd immunity as providing protection, fear of rapid vaccine development and side effects, belief the virus is man- made and related to population control. Particularly those who obtain information from relatively unregulated social media sources such as YouTube that have recommendations tailored by watch history are less likely to be willing to become vaccinated. Those who hold general conspiratorial beliefs are less willing to be vaccinated. Since an increasing number of individuals use social media for gathering health information, interventions require action from governments, health officials and social media companies. More attention needs to help people understand their own risks, unpack complex concepts and fill knowledge voids.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementResearch Funding support has been provided by the ESRC UKRI UK in a Changing Europe programme, the Leverhulme Centre Leverhulme Centre for Demographic Science and ERC 2018 ADG 835079.Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:This study was approved by the Faculty of Social Sciences Research Ethics Committee at the University of Southampton (Ethics/ERGO Number: 61735).All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesUpon publication, processes to access data and code will be made available.