RT Journal Article
SR Electronic
T1 Implementation of predictive risk stratification to reduce emergency admissions to hospital: experiences of general practitioners and practice managers
JF medRxiv
FD Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press
SP 2021.01.25.21250442
DO 10.1101/2021.01.25.21250442
A1 Evans, Bridie Angela
A1 Davies, Jan
A1 Dale, Jeremy
A1 Hutchings, Hayley
A1 Kingston, Mark
A1 Porter, Alison
A1 Russell, Ian
A1 Williams, Victoria
A1 Snooks, Helen
YR 2021
UL http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2021/01/26/2021.01.25.21250442.abstract
AB Aim In a trial evaluating the introduction of a predictive risk stratification model (PRISM) into primary care, we reported statistically significant increases in emergency hospital admissions and use of other NHS services without evidence of benefits to patients or the NHS. The aim of this study was to explore the views and experiences of general practitioners (GPs) and practice managers on incorporating PRISM into routine practice.Methods We interviewed 22 GPs and practice managers in 18 participating practices at two timepoints: 3-6 months after PRISM was available in their practice; and at study end, up to 18 months later. We recorded and transcribed interviews and analysed data thematically using Normalisation Process Theory.Results Respondents reported that the decision to use PRISM was based mainly on fulfilling reporting requirements for Quality and Outcome Framework (QOF) incentives. Most applied it to a very small number of patients for a short period. Using PRISM entailed technical tasks, information sharing within practice meetings and changes to patient care. These were diverse and generally small scale. Use was inhibited by PRISM not being integrated with practice systems. Respondents’ evaluation of PRISM was mixed: most doubted it had any large scale impact, but many cited examples of impact on individual patient care. They reported increased awareness of patients in high risk groups.Conclusions Qualitative results suggest mixed views of predictive risk stratification in primary care and raised awareness of highest-risk patient groups, potentially affecting unplanned hospital attendance and admissions. To inform future policy, decision-makers need more information about implementation and effects of emergency admissions risk stratification tools in primary and community settings.Trial registration Controlled Clinical Trials no. ISRCTN55538212.Competing Interest StatementHS is a member of the National Institute of Health Research (NIHR) Health Technology Assessment (HTA) editorial board and a scientific advisor to the NIHR Health Services and Delivery Research (HS&DR) Programme. The other authors declare that they have no competing interests.Clinical TrialISRCTN55538212.Clinical Protocols https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3848373/pdf/1745-6215-14-301.pdf Funding StatementThis study was funded by the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Health Services and Delivery Research Programme (Grant Number: 09/1801/1054).Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:We gained ethical approval from the Multi-Centre Research Ethics Committee for Wales (reference 10/MRE09/25). All respondents gave informed consent in writing to participate in this study.All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).Yes I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesAll data generated or analysed during this study are included in this published article.NHSNational Health ServiceQOFQuality and Outcomes FrameworkUKUnited KingdomNIHRNational Institute for Health ResearchPRISMATICPredictive RIsk Stratification Model: A Trial In primary CarePRISMPredictive Risk Stratification ModelGPGeneral PractitionerNPTNormalisation Process TheorySUCCESSService Users with Chronic Conditions Encouraging Sensible SolutionsEDEmergency Department