RT Journal Article
SR Electronic
T1 Mask adherence and rate of COVID-19 across the United States
JF medRxiv
FD Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press
SP 2021.01.18.21250029
DO 10.1101/2021.01.18.21250029
A1 Fischer, Charlie B.
A1 Adrien, Nedghie
A1 Silguero, Jeremiah J.
A1 Hopper, Julianne J.
A1 Chowdhury, Abir I.
A1 Werler, Martha M.
YR 2021
UL http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2021/01/25/2021.01.18.21250029.abstract
AB Mask wearing has been advocated by public health officials as a way to reduce the spread of COVID-19. In the United States, policies on mask wearing have varied from state to state over the course of the pandemic. Even as more and more government leaders encourage or even mandate mask wearing, many citizens still resist the notion. Our research examines mask-wearing policy and adherence in association with COVID-19 case rates. We used state-level data on mask-wearing policy for the general public and on proportion of residents who stated they always wear masks in public. For all 50 states and the District of Columbia (DC), these data were abstracted by month for April⍰September 2020 to measure their impact on COVID-19 rates in the subsequent month (May⍰October 2020). Monthly COVID-19 case rates (number of cases per capita over two weeks) >200 per 100,000 residents were considered high. Fourteen of the 15 states with no mask-wearing policy for the general public reported a high COVID-19 rate. Of the 8 states with at least 75% mask adherence, none reported a high COVID-19 rate. States with the lowest levels of mask adherence were most likely to have high COVID-19 rates in the subsequent month, independent of mask policy or demographic factors. Our analysis suggests high adherence to mask wearing could be a key factor in reducing the spread of COVID-19. This association between high mask adherence and reduced COVID-19 rates should influence policy makers and public health officials to focus on ways to improve mask adherence across the population in order to mitigate the spread of COVID-19.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementNo external funding was obtained for any part of this work.Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:This study does not examine individual-level data. All data reported are at the state level. Therefore, I believe it is exempt. However, this declaration prompted me to submit an IRB protocol to get their formal exemption. I anticipate having this exemption by January 22, 2021.All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesThe data are publicly available from the sites listed below. http://www.tinyurl.com/statepolicies https://covid19.healthdata.org/united-states-of-america?view=mask-use&tab=trend https://data.cdc.gov/Case-Surveillance/United-States-COVID-19-Cases-and-Deaths-by-State-o/9mfq-cb36/data https://www.ers.usda.gov/data-products/county-level-data-sets/download-data