RT Journal Article
SR Electronic
T1 From “don, doff, and discard” to “don, doff, and decontaminate” – determination of filtering facepiece respirator and surgical mask integrity and inactivation of a SARS-CoV-2 surrogate and a small non-enveloped virus following multiple-cycles of vaporised hydrogen peroxide, ultraviolet germicidal irradiation, and dry heat decontamination
JF medRxiv
FD Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press
SP 2021.01.15.21249866
DO 10.1101/2021.01.15.21249866
A1 Ludwig-Begall, Louisa F.
A1 Wielick, Constance
A1 Jolois, Olivier
A1 Dams, Lorène
A1 Razafimahefa, Ravo M.
A1 Nauwynck, Hans
A1 Demeuldre, Pierre-Francois
A1 Napp, Aurore
A1 Laperre, Jan
A1 Farnir, Frédéric
A1 Thiry, Etienne
A1 Haubruge, Eric
YR 2021
UL http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2021/01/15/2021.01.15.21249866.abstract
AB Background As the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic accelerates, the supply of personal protective equipment remains under strain. To combat shortages, re-use of surgical masks and filtering facepiece respirators has been recommended. Prior decontamination is paramount to the re-use of these typically single-use only items and, without compromising their integrity, must guarantee inactivation of SARS-CoV-2 and other contaminating pathogens.Aim We provide information on the effect of time-dependent passive decontamination at room temperature and evaluate inactivation of a SARS-CoV-2 surrogate and a non-enveloped model virus as well as mask and respirator integrity following active multiple-cycle vaporised hydrogen peroxide (VHP), ultraviolet germicidal irradiation (UVGI), and dry heat (DH) decontamination.Methods Masks and respirators, inoculated with infectious porcine respiratory coronavirus or murine norovirus, were submitted to passive decontamination or single or multiple active decontamination cycles; viruses were recovered from sample materials and viral titres were measured via TCID50 assay. In parallel, filtration efficiency tests and breathability tests were performed according to EN standard 14683 and NIOSH regulations.Results and Discussion Infectious porcine respiratory coronavirus and murine norovirus remained detectable on masks and respirators up to five and seven days of passive decontamination. Single and multiple cycles of VHP-, UVGI-, and DH were shown to not adversely affect bacterial filtration efficiency of masks. Single- and multiple UVGI did not adversely affect respirator filtration efficiency, while VHP and DH induced a decrease in filtration efficiency after one or three decontamination cycles. Multiple cycles of VHP-, UVGI-, and DH slightly decreased airflow resistance of masks but did not adversely affect respirator breathability. VHP and UVGI efficiently inactivated both viruses after five, DH after three, decontamination cycles, permitting demonstration of a loss of infectivity by more than three orders of magnitude. This multi-disciplinal approach provides important information on how often a given PPE item may be safely reused.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementThis work was supported by a grant from the Walloon Region, Belgium (Project 2010053 -2020- "MASK - Decontamination and reuse of surgical masks and filtering facepiece respirators") and the ULiege Fonds Speciaux pour la Recherche 2020.Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:No IRB and/or ethics committee approvals were neccessary in the context of this work.All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).Yes I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesThe authors confirm that the data supporting the findings of this study are available within the article [and/or] its supplementary materials.FFRfiltering facepiece respiratorSMsurgical maskSARS-CoV-2severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2PRCVporcine respiratory coronavirusMuNoVmurine norovirusUVGIultraviolet germicidal irradiationVHPvaporised hydrogen peroxideDHdry heatBFEbacterial filtration efficiency