RT Journal Article
SR Electronic
T1 Occupational and environmental exposure to SARS-CoV-2 in and around infected mink farms
JF medRxiv
FD Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press
SP 2021.01.06.20248760
DO 10.1101/2021.01.06.20248760
A1 de Rooij, Myrna M.T.
A1 Hakze-Van der Honing, Renate W.
A1 Hulst, Marcel M.
A1 Harders, Frank
A1 Engelsma, Marc
A1 van de Hoef, Wouter
A1 Meliefste, Kees
A1 Nieuwenweg, Sigrid
A1 Munnink, Bas B. Oude
A1 Schothorst, Isabella van
A1 Sikkema, Reina S.
A1 van der Spek, Arco N.
A1 Spierenburg, Marcel
A1 Spithoven, Jack
A1 Bouwstra, Ruth
A1 Molenaar, Robert-Jan
A1 Koopmans, Marion
A1 Stegeman, Arjan
A1 van der Poel, Wim H.M.
A1 Smit, Lidwien A.M.
YR 2021
UL http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2021/01/14/2021.01.06.20248760.abstract
AB Unprecedented SARS-CoV-2 infections in farmed minks raised immediate concerns regarding human health which initiated intensive environmental investigations. Air sampling was performed in infected mink farms, at farm premises and at residential sites. A range of other environmental samples were collected from minks’ housing units including bedding material. Inside the farms, high levels of SARS-CoV-2 RNA were found in airborne dust, on surfaces, and on various other environmental matrices. This warns for occupational exposure which was substantiated by considerable SARS-CoV-2 RNA concentrations in personal air samples. Dispersion of SARS-CoV-2 to outdoor air was found to be limited and SARS-CoV-2 RNA was not detected in air samples collected beyond farm premises, implying a negligible environmental exposure risk for nearby communities. Our occupational and environmental risk assessment is in line with whole genome sequences analyses showing mink-to-human transmission in farm workers, but no indications for direct zoonotic transmission events to nearby communities.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementThis work was funded by the Netherlands Ministry of Agriculture, Nature and Foods.Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:The Medical Research Ethics Committee (MREC) Utrecht confirmed that the Medical Research Involving Human Subjects Act (WMO) does not apply to (personal) air sampling, and that therefore an official approval of this study by the MREC Utrecht was not required under the WMO (Protocol 20-385/C, reference number WAG/mb/20/021975).All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesThe datasets generated during and/or analysed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.