RT Journal Article
SR Electronic
T1 Parental feeding and childhood genetic risk for obesity: Exploring hypothetical interventions with causal inference methods
JF medRxiv
FD Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press
SP 2021.01.07.21249377
DO 10.1101/2021.01.07.21249377
A1 Herle, Moritz
A1 Pickles, Andrew
A1 Micali, Nadia
A1 Abdulkadir, Mohamed
A1 De Stavola, Bianca
YR 2021
UL http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2021/01/08/2021.01.07.21249377.abstract
AB Parental feeding behaviors are common intervention targets for childhood obesity, but often only deliver small changes. Childhood BMI is partly driven by genetic effects, and the extent to which parental feeding interventions can mediate child genetic liability is not known. Here we aim to examine how potential interventions on parental feeding behaviors can mitigate some of the association between child genetic liability and BMI in early adolescence, using causal inference based methods. Data were from the Avon Longitudinal Study of Parents and Children and we quantified the interventional disparity measure of child genetic risk for BMI (PRS-BMI) on objectively BMI at 12 years, if we were to intervene on parental feeding styles measured when children were 10-11 years (n=4,248). Results are presented as Adjusted Total Association (Adj-Ta) between genetic liability and BMI at 12 years, versus the Interventional Disparity Measure Direct Effect (IDM-DE), which represents the association, that would remain, had we intervened on the parental feeding. For children with the top quintile of genetic liability, an intervention shifting parental feeding to the levels of children with lowest genetic risk, resulted in a difference of 0.81 kg/m2 in BMI at 12y (Adj-Ta= 3.27, 95%CI: 3.04, 3.49; versus IDM-DE=2.46, 95%CI: 2.24, 2.67). Findings suggest that parental feeding interventions have the potential to buffer some of the genetic liability for childhood obesity. Further, we highlight a novel way to analyze potential interventions for health conditions only using secondary data analyses, by combining methodology from statistical genetics and social epidemiology.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementThis research was supported by a fellowship from the Medical Research Council UK (MR/T027843/1) awarded to M.H.. The UK Medical Research Council and Wellcome (Grant Ref: 217065/Z/19/Z) and the University of Bristol provide core support for ALSPAC. A comprehensive list of grants funding is available on the ALSPAC website (http://www.bristol.ac.uk/alspac/external/documents/grant-acknowledgements.pdf). GWAS data was generated by Sample Logistics and Genotyping Facilities at Wellcome Sanger Institute and LabCorp (Laboratory Corporation of America) using support from 23andMe. A.P. is partially supported by National Institute of Health Research NF-SI-0617-10120 and Biomedical Research Centre at South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust and Kings College London. The views expressed are those of the authors and not necessarily those of the UK NHS, NIHR, or the Department of Health and Social Care. The authors acknowledge use of the research computing facility at Kings College London, Rosalind (https://rosalind.kcl.ac.uk), which is delivered in partnership with the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Biomedical Research Centres at South London & Maudsley and Guys & St. Thomas NHS Foundation Trusts, and part-funded by capital equipment grants from the Maudsley Charity (award 980) and Guys & St. Thomas Charity (TR130505). The views expressed are those of the author(s) and not necessarily those of the NHS, the NIHR, Kings College London, or the Department of Health and Social Care. Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:Ethical approval for the ALSPAC participants was obtained from the ALSPAC Ethics and Law Committee and the Local Research Ethics Committees: www.bristol.ac.uk/alspac/researchers/research-ethics/. Consent for biological samples was collected in accordance with the Human Tissue Act (2004).All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesData are not available. For data access queries, please refer to: http://www.bristol.ac.uk/alspac/researchers/access/