PT  - JOURNAL ARTICLE
AU  - Garstang, Joanna
AU  - Eatwell, Daisy
AU  - Sidebotham, Peter
AU  - Taylor, Julie
TI  - Common Factors in Serious Case Reviews of Child Maltreatment where there is a Medical Cause of Death: Qualitative Thematic Analysis
AID  - 10.1101/2021.01.05.20248250
DP  - 2021 Jan 01
TA  - medRxiv
PG  - 2021.01.05.20248250
4099  - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2021/01/06/2021.01.05.20248250.short
4100  - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2021/01/06/2021.01.05.20248250.full
AB  - Aim To identify common factors in Serious Case Reviews (SCRs) where a child has died of a medical cause. Design: Qualitative thematic analysis.Background SCRs take place when neglect or abuse results in children dying or being seriously harmed. Known key factors within SCRs include parental substance misuse, mental health problems, and domestic abuse. To date there has been no investigation of children who die of a medical cause where there are concerns about child maltreatment.Data sources A list of SCRs relating to deaths through medical causes was provided from previous coded studies and accessed from the NSPCC National Case Review Repository. Twenty-three SCRs with a medical cause of death from 1st April 2009-31st March 2017 were sourced.Results Twenty children died of an acute condition and 12 of a chronic condition; 20 of the deaths were unexpected and maltreatment contributed to the deaths of 18 children. Most children were either under one or over 16 at time of death. Many parents were caring for a child with additional vulnerabilities including behavioural issues (6/23), learning difficulties (6/23), mental health issues (5/23) or a chronic medical condition (12/23). Common parental experiences included: domestic violence/abuse (13/23), drug/alcohol misuse (10/23), mental ill health or struggling to cope (7/23), criminal history (11/23), and caring for another vulnerable individual (8/23). Most children lived in a chaotic household characterised by missed medical appointments (18/23), poor school attendance (11/23), poor physical home environment (7/23) and disguised compliance (12/23). All 23 SCRs reported elements of abusive or neglectful parenting. In most there was evidence of cumulative harm, where multiple factors contributed to their premature death. At the time of death 11 children were receiving social care support.Conclusion While the underlying medical cause of the child’s death was often incurable, the maltreatment that often exacerbated the medical issue could have been prevented.Article Summary. Strengths and weaknesses of the studyNo other study has analysed SCRs in which children have died of medical causes.The most complete dataset possible was used to conduct the robust analysis: SCRs were sourced from the complete list from the Department for Education used for previous national analyses of SCRs.Randomly selected SCRs were re-coded by two further researchers to check for any discrepancies in coding, increasing the reliability of results.Not all child deaths lead to SCR, even when there are concerns about maltreatment; local areas may differ on their threshold of suspicion; content within SCRs is often variable and inconsistent; so there may be deaths relevant to this study which were not included.We only investigated those cases in which a child died, focusing therefore on the worst cases and perhaps missing incidents in which a child had a medical condition and experienced maltreatment but did not die.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementThe study was not funded. JG is funded by West Midlands Clinical Research Network (NIHR) as a Clinical Trials Scholar. The views expressed are those of the authors and not necessarily those of the NHS, or the NIHR. The University of Birmingham funded the article processing charge.Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:This study involved analysing serious case reviews that are in the public domain. It therefore does not require HRA ethical approval.All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).Yes I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesSerious case reviews are available at the National Repository https://learning.nspcc.org.uk/case-reviews/national-case-review-repository