RT Journal Article
SR Electronic
T1 Environmental scan of provincial and territorial planning for COVID-19 vaccination programs
JF medRxiv
FD Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press
SP 2020.12.22.20248685
DO 10.1101/2020.12.22.20248685
A1 MacDonald, Shannon E.
A1 Sell, Hannah
A1 Wilson, Sarah
A1 Meyer, Samantha B.
A1 Gagneur, Arnaud
A1 Assi, Ali
A1 Sadarangani, Manish
A1 ,
YR 2020
UL http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2020/12/24/2020.12.22.20248685.abstract
AB Background Public health departments in Canada are currently facing the challenging task of planning and implementing COVID-19 vaccination programs.Objective To collect and synthesize information regarding COVID-19 vaccination programs in each of the provinces and territories (P/Ts).Methods Provincial/territorial public health leaders were interviewed via teleconference between August-October 2020 to collect information on the following topics, drawn from scientific literature and media: unique factors for COVID-19 vaccination, adoption of National Advisory Committee on Immunization (NACI) recommendations, priority groups for early vaccination, and vaccine safety and effectiveness monitoring. Data were grouped according to common responses and descriptive analysis was performed.Results Eighteen interviews occurred with 25 participants from 11 of 13 P/Ts. Factors unique to COVID-19 vaccination included prioritizing groups for early vaccination (n=7), public perception of vaccines (n=6), and differing eligibility criteria (n=5). Almost all P/Ts (n=10) reported reliance on NACI recommendations. Long-term care residents (n=10) and health care workers (n=10) were most frequently prioritized for early vaccination, followed by people with chronic medical conditions (n=9) and seniors (n=8). Most P/Ts (n=9) are planning routine adverse event monitoring to assess vaccine safety. Evaluation of effectiveness was anticipated to occur within public health departments (n=3), by researchers (n=3), or based on national guidance (n=4).Conclusion Plans for COVID-19 vaccination programs in the P/Ts exhibit some similarities and are largely consistent with NACI guidelines, with some discrepancies. Further research is needed to evaluate the success of COVID-19 vaccination programs once implemented.Competing Interest StatementSMacDonald is supported by a salary award from the Canadian Child Health Clinician Scientist Program. MS is supported via salary awards from the BC Childrens Hospital Foundation, the Canadian Child Health Clinician Scientist Program and the Michael Smith Foundation for Health Research. MS has been an investigator on projects funded by GlaxoSmithKline, Merck, Pfizer, Sanofi-Pasteur, Seqirus, Symvivo and VBI Vaccines. All funds have been paid to his institute, and he has not received any personal payments.Funding StatementThis work was funded by the Canadian Institutes of Health Research.Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:Ethical approval for this study was obtained from the Health Research Ethics Board at the University of Alberta.All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesData are not publicly available, due to the potential for participants to be identifiable through the data.