PT - JOURNAL ARTICLE AU - Hanrath, Aidan T. AU - Schim van der Loeff, Ina AU - Lendrem, Dennis W. AU - Baker, Kenneth F. AU - Price, David A. AU - McDowall, Peter AU - McDowall, Kiera AU - Cook, Sue AU - Towns, Peter AU - Schwab, Ulrich AU - Evans, Adam AU - Dixon, Jill AU - Collins, Jennifer AU - Burton-Fanning, Shirelle AU - Saunders, David AU - Harwood, Jayne AU - Samuel, Julie AU - Schmid, Matthias L. AU - Pareja-Cebrian, Lucia AU - Hunter, Ewan AU - Murphy, Elizabeth AU - Taha, Yusri AU - Payne, Brendan A. I. AU - Duncan, Christopher J.A. TI - SARS-CoV-2 testing of 11,884 healthcare workers at an acute NHS hospital trust in England: a retrospective analysis AID - 10.1101/2020.12.22.20242362 DP - 2020 Jan 01 TA - medRxiv PG - 2020.12.22.20242362 4099 - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2020/12/22/2020.12.22.20242362.short 4100 - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2020/12/22/2020.12.22.20242362.full AB - Healthcare workers (HCWs) are known to be at increased risk of infection with SARS-CoV-2, although whether these risks are equal across all roles is uncertain. Here we report a retrospective analysis of a large real-world dataset obtained from 10 March to 6 July 2020 in an NHS Foundation Trust in England with 17,126 employees. 3,338 HCWs underwent symptomatic PCR testing (14.4% positive, 2.8% of all staff) and 11,103 HCWs underwent serological testing for SARS-CoV-2 IgG (8.4% positive, 5.5% of all staff). Seropositivity was lower than other hospital settings in England but higher than community estimates. Increased test positivity rates were observed in HCWs from BAME backgrounds and residents in areas of higher social deprivation. A logistic regression model adjusting for these factors showed significant increases in the odds of testing positive in certain occupational groups, most notably domestic services staff, nurses and health-care assistants. PCR testing of symptomatic HCWs appeared to underestimate overall infection levels, probably due to asymptomatic seroconversion. Clinical outcomes were reassuring, with only a small minority of HCWs with COVID-19 requiring hospitalisation (2.3%) or ICU management (0.7%) and with no deaths. Despite a relatively low level of HCW infection compared to other UK cohorts, there were nevertheless important differences in test positivity rates between occupational groups, robust to adjustment for demographic factors such as ethnic background and social deprivation. Quantitative and qualitative studies are needed to better understand the factors contributing to this risk. Robust informatics solutions for HCW exposure data are essential to inform occupational monitoring.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementCJAD is funded by the Wellcome Trust (211153/Z/18/Z), the UKRI UK-Coronavirus Immunology Consortium, and the Barbour Foundation. AH is funded by the British Medical Association. KFB is funded by a National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Clinical Lectureship (CL-2017-01-004). BAIP is funded by the Wellcome Trust (109975/Z/15/Z, 203105/Z/16/Z).Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:This manuscript was reviewed by Mr Paddy Stevenson, Chairman of the Newcastle and North Tyneside 1 Research Ethics Committee (NHSBT Newcastle Blood Donor Centre, Holland Drive, Newcastle upon Tyne, NE2 4NQ) and Mr Ian Campbell Chairman of the Tyne and Wear South Research Ethics Committee (NHSBT Newcastle Blood Donor Centre, Holland Drive, Newcastle upon Tyne, NE2 4NQ). The decision was that ethical approval was waived.All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesPlease refer requests to corresponding author. Data is protected by NHS Caldicott guidelines.