PT  - JOURNAL ARTICLE
AU  - Hiironen, Iina
AU  - Saavedra-Campos, Maria
AU  - Panitz, Jennifer
AU  - Ma, Thomas
AU  - Nsonwu, Olisaeloka
AU  - Charlett, Andre
AU  - Hughes, Gareth
AU  - Oliver, Isabel
TI  - Occupational exposures associated with being a COVID-19 case; evidence from three case-controls studies
AID  - 10.1101/2020.12.21.20248161
DP  - 2020 Jan 01
TA  - medRxiv
PG  - 2020.12.21.20248161
4099  - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2020/12/22/2020.12.21.20248161.short
4100  - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2020/12/22/2020.12.21.20248161.full
AB  - Background The evidence on risk factors for transmission of SARS-CoV-2 in community settings is sparse, yet this information is key to inform public health action. We investigated factors associated with being a COVID-19 case using data collected through contact tracing.Methods We conducted three retrospective, frequency-matched case-control studies between August 2020 and October 2020 using case data from the NHS Test and Trace programme. Controls were obtained through Market Research Panels. Multivariable analyses provided adjusted odds ratios (aORs) for multiple community exposure settings. We analysed the results in meta-analyses using random effects models to obtain pooled odds ratios (pORs).Results Across all study periods, there was strong statistical evidence that working in healthcare (pOR 2.87, aOR range 2.72-3.08), social care (pOR 4.15, aOR range 2.46-5.41) or hospitality (pOR 2.36, aOR range 2.01-2.63) were associated with increased odds of being a COVID-19 case. There was also evidence that working in warehouse setting was associated with increased odds (pOR 3.86, aOR range 1.06-14.19), with a substantial increase in odds observed over the study periods. A similar pattern was also observed in education and construction.Conclusions The studies indicate that some workplace settings are associated with increased odds of being a case. However, it is not possible to determine how much of the transmission of SARS-CoV-2 took place within the workplace, and how much was associated with social, household or transport exposures.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementThis study was funded by Public Health England. No external funding was received.Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:The study protocol was subject to an internal review by the Research Ethics and Governance Group, which is the PHE Research Ethics Committee, and was found to be fully compliant with all regulatory requirements, and was classified as surveillance that was being undertaken as part of PHEs responsibility to respond to the COVID-19 current pandemic. PHE has legal permission, provided by Regulation 3 of The Health Service (Control of Patient Information) Regulations 2002 to collect confidential patient information (http://www.legislation.gov.uk/uksi/2002/1438/regulation/3/made) under Sections 3(i) (a) to (c), 3(i)(d) (i) and (ii) and 3(3) as part of its outbreak response activities. As such this work falls outside the remit for ethical review and as no regulatory issues were identified the protocol was approved by the group.All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesApplications for relevant anonymised data should be submitted to the Public Health England Office for Data Release: https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/accessing-public-health-england-data/about-the-phe-odr-and-accessing-data