RT Journal Article
SR Electronic
T1 Lessons learned from Vietnam’s COVID-19 response: the role of adaptive behavior change and testing in epidemic control
JF medRxiv
FD Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press
SP 2020.12.18.20248454
DO 10.1101/2020.12.18.20248454
A1 Pham, Quang D.
A1 Stuart, Robyn M.
A1 Nguyen, Thuong V.
A1 Luong, Quang C.
A1 Tran, Dai Q.
A1 Pham, Thai Q.
A1 Phan, Lan T.
A1 Dang, Tan Q.
A1 Tran, Duong N.
A1 Do, Hung T.
A1 Mistry, Dina
A1 Klein, Daniel J.
A1 Abeysuriya, Romesh G.
A1 Oron, Assaf P.
A1 Kerr, Cliff C.
YR 2020
UL http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2020/12/19/2020.12.18.20248454.abstract
AB Background Vietnam has emerged as one of the world’s leading success stories in responding to COVID-19. After prolonged zero-low transmission, a summer outbreak of unknown source at Da Nang caused the country’s first COVID-19 deaths, but was quickly suppressed. Vietnam recently reopened its borders to international travelers. Understanding the attendant risks and how to minimize them is crucial as Vietnam moves into this new phase.Methods We create an agent-based model of COVID-19 in Vietnam, using regional testing data and a detailed linelist of the 1,014 COVID-19 cases, including 35 deaths, identified across Vietnam. We investigate the Da Nang outbreak, and quantify the risk of another outbreak under different assumptions about behavioral/policy responses and ongoing testing.Results The Da Nang outbreak, although rapidly contained once detected, nevertheless caused significant community transmission before it was detected; higher symptomatic testing could have mitigated this. If testing levels do not increase, the adoption of past policies in response to newly-detected cases may reduce the size of potential outbreaks but will not prevent them. Compared to a baseline symptomatic testing rate of 10%, we estimate half as many infections under a 20% testing rate, and a quarter as many with 40-50% testing rates, over the four months following border reopenings.Conclusions Vietnam’s success in controlling COVID-19 is largely attributable to its rapid response to detected outbreaks, but the speed of response could be improved even further with higher levels of symptomatic testing.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementFunding was provided by Vietnam's Ministry of Science and Technology (Grant: 32/20-ĐTĐL.CN-CNN)Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:Not requiredAll necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).Yes I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesCode for Covasim is available from https://github.com/institutefordiseasemodeling/covasim. The code and data used to run all the analyses that are included in this article are available from the corresponding author upon request during the article review period, and will be placed in a public GitHub repository after manuscript acceptance.