RT Journal Article
SR Electronic
T1 The association between work situation and life satisfaction during the COVID-19 pandemic: prospective cohort study in Norway
JF medRxiv
FD Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press
SP 2020.12.16.20248321
DO 10.1101/2020.12.16.20248321
A1 Øen Carlsen, Ellen
A1 Caspersen, Ida Henriette
A1 Ask, Helga
A1 Brandlistuen, Ragnhild Eek
A1 Trogstad, Lill
A1 Magnus, Per
YR 2020
UL http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2020/12/16/2020.12.16.20248321.abstract
AB Objectives To analyse the population effects on life quality of being laid off from work, having to work from home, or having been diagnosed with COVID-19.Design Nationwide population-based cohort study.Setting Norway.Participants We followed more than 80,000 participants in an ongoing cohort study, the Norwegian Mother, Father and Child Cohort Study (MoBa) during the COVID-19 pandemic. We analysed current life satisfaction in April and again in September/October 2020 for subjects whose work situation and infection status had changed.Main outcome measures Self-reported satisfaction with life, using a scale from 0 (worst) to 10 (best).Results Temporary and permanent layoffs, working from a home-based office, and getting a COVID-19 diagnosis were associated with modestly, but significantly lower concurrent life satisfaction, both on a population level and for subjects who changed status. The associations with change in work situation were stronger for men. For men with permanent job loss, the adjusted odds ratio for low life satisfaction (<6) was 3.2 (95% CI 2.4 to 4.2) in April and 4.9 (95% CI 3.5 to 6.9) in autumn. A suspected or confirmed COVID-19 diagnosis was associated with an adjusted odds ratio for low life satisfaction of 1.9 (95% CI 1.6 to 2.3) in spring. The strength of associations between work situation and life satisfaction did not vary much across socio-economic strata, but layoffs were more common among those with low education.Conclusion Layoffs, home office and infection status had clear impact on the quality of life as measured with a global life satisfaction scale. These findings suggest that social differentials in quality of life, are increasing during the pandemic.Funding This work was funded by the Norwegian Research Council’s Centres of Excellence Funding Scheme (no. 262700) and by the Norwegian Institute of Public Health (NIPH).What is already known on this topic− Being laid off from work or having to work from a home-based office is usually associated with reduced life quality.− The population effect has not been estimated during the present surge in cases of COVID-19 in Europe.What this study adds− This population-based study shows that life satisfaction in Norway has been stable from the first to the second wave of the pandemic, but that both layoffs and working from home is associated with reduced life satisfaction, especially among men.− The reduced life satisfaction in people working from a home-based office implies that large proportions of the population are affected.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementThis work was funded by the Norwegian Research Council Centres of Excellence Funding Scheme (no. 262700) and by the Norwegian Institute of Public Health (NIPH).Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:The current sub-study was approved by The Regional Committee for Medical and Health Research Ethics, South East Norway C, no. 127708.All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesThe data underlying this article are available for analysis after approval from a Norwegian ethics committee and application to the Norwegian Institute of Public Health.