RT Journal Article
SR Electronic
T1 The medical signature of musicians: A Phenome-wide association study using an Electronic Health Record database
JF medRxiv
FD Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press
SP 2020.08.14.20175109
DO 10.1101/2020.08.14.20175109
A1 Niarchou, Maria
A1 Lin, George
A1 Lense, Miriam D.
A1 Gordon, Reyna
A1 Davis, Lea
YR 2020
UL http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2020/12/14/2020.08.14.20175109.abstract
AB Background A limited set of previous studies suggest musicians may be at higher risk for a unique set of medical and mental health problems. To address the limitations of previous studies, we examined trends in the medical care of musicians in Vanderbilt’s Electronic Health Record research database.Methods We mined clinical notes for a principled collection of keywords and regular expressions which indicated that the patient was a musician. We identified 9,803 “musicians” that we matched for sex, median age (across the medical record), ethnicity, race, length of record and number of visits with 49,015 controls. We fitted 1,263 logistic regression models (one for each phenotype classification).Results 257 medical diagnoses were significantly more prevalent in musicians than controls after strict Bonferroni adjustment for the total number of phenotypes tested (p-value<7.6 x 10−6). Diseases of the larynx and the vocal cords (OR=2.32, p<2.84 x 10−191), and hearing loss (OR=1.36, p=5.98 x 10−97) were among the top associations. Anxiety disorder (OR=1.25, p=7.67 x 10−71), and Major depressive disorder (OR=1.21, p=4.88 x 10−36) were also strongly associated with musician status. Fifteen phenotypes were significantly more prevalent in non-musicians than musicians, including Coronary atherosclerosis (OR=0.91, p=1.77 x 10−10), and Ischemic Heart Disease (OR=0.92, p=1.65 x 10−09).Conclusions Although being a musician was related to a large number of occupational health problems, we also identified protective effects of musicianship in which certain diagnoses were less common in musicians than in non-musicians, indicating that active musical engagement could have similar health benefits to athletic engagement.What is already known on this subject?Being a musician is a physically and psychologically demanding undertaking. Previous studies suggest musicians may be at higher risk for a variety of medical and mental health problems.What this study adds?Most studies of musicians’ health, are based on relatively small sample sizes, self-report questionnaire data, and often lack controls groups. In a sample of 14,379 musician cases and 71,895 matched controls identified in an Electronic Health Record database (EHR), we conducted the first and largest study to date to identify the medical diagnoses associated with musician patients in an EHR context. We replicated previous associations of musician status with medical problems and we identified a number of protective effects by observing diagnoses such as cardiovascular disease, respiratory failure, and renal failure, that were less common in musicians than in controls, in line with literature indicating that active musical engagement has similar health benefits to athletic engagement.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementThis project was supported by funding from the National Institutes of Health, NIH Common Fund through the Office of the NIH Director under Award Number DP2HD098859. The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the National Institutes of Health. We would also like to thank the Nashville Musicians Association and especially Kathy Osborne for providing us with the list of the most popular musical instruments. Synthetic Derivative The project described was supported by the National Center for Research Resources, Grant UL1 RR024975-01, and is now at the National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences, Grant 2 UL1 TR000445-06. The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the NIH. Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:This study is approved by Vanderbilt's Institutional Review Board for non-human subjects research (IRB #160302).All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesDue to data sharing restrictions related to privacy concerns in the EHR, the datasets generated from our hospital population will not be publicly available, however, all scripts used in the study are available upon request.