PT - JOURNAL ARTICLE AU - Dall’Ora, Chiara AU - Griffiths, Peter AU - Hope, Joanna AU - Briggs, Jim AU - Jones, Jeremy AU - Gerry, Stephen AU - Redfern, Oliver TI - How long do nursing staff take to measure and record patients’ vital signs observations in hospital? A time-and-motion study AID - 10.1101/2020.12.09.20246355 DP - 2020 Jan 01 TA - medRxiv PG - 2020.12.09.20246355 4099 - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2020/12/11/2020.12.09.20246355.short 4100 - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2020/12/11/2020.12.09.20246355.full AB - Introduction Monitoring vital signs in hospital is an important part of safe patient care. However, there are no robust estimates of the workload it generates for nursing staff. This makes it difficult to plan adequate staffing to ensure current monitoring protocols can be delivered.Objective To estimate the time taken to measure and record one set of patient’s vital signs observations; and to identify factors associated with time to measure and record one set of patient’s vital signs observations.Methods We undertook a time-and-motion study of 16 acute medical or surgical wards across four hospitals in England. One hospital recorded vital signs on paper, while three recorded measurements on electronic devices. Two trained observers followed a standard operating procedure to record the time taken to measure and record vital sign observations. We used mixed-effects models to estimate the mean time using whole observation rounds, which included preparation time, or time spent taking observations at the bedside. We tested whether our estimates were influenced by nurse, ward and hospital factors.Results After excluding non-vital signs related interruptions, dividing the length of an observation round by the number of observations in that round yielded an estimated time per observation set of 5 minutes and 1 second (95% Confidence Interval (CI) = 4:39-5:24). If interruptions within the round were included, the estimated time was 6:26 (95% CI = 6:01-6:50). If only time taking each patient’s observations at the bedside was considered, after excluding non-vital signs related interruptions the estimated time was 3:45 (95% CI = 3:32-3:58). We found no substantial differences by hospital, ward or nurse characteristics, despite different systems for recording observations being used across the hospitals.Discussion The time taken to observe and record a patient’s vital signs is considerable, so changes to recommended observation frequency could have major workload implications. Variation in estimates derived from previous studies may, in part, arise from a lack of clarity about what was included in the reported times. We found no evidence that nurses save time when using electronic vital signs recording, or that the grade of staff taking the observation influenced the time taken.Conclusions Taking and recording vital signs observations is time consuming and the impact of interruptions and preparation away from the bedside is considerable. When considering the nursing workload around vital signs observations, no assumption of relative efficiency should be made if different technologies or staff groups are deployed.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementThis report presents independent research funded by the UK National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Health Services and Delivery Research Programme (award number 17/05/03). The views and opinions expressed in this publication are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect those of the NHS, the NIHR, NETSCC, the Health Services and Delivery Research Programme or the Department of Health and Social Care.Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:We obtained ethical approval for this study from the Research Ethics Committee, South Central Berkshire, Committee ref: 19/SC/0190All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesData are available upon request.