PT - JOURNAL ARTICLE AU - Percival, John AU - Abbott, Katharine AU - Allain, Theresa AU - Bradley, Rachel AU - Cramp, Fiona AU - Donovan, Jenny AU - McCabe, Candy AU - Neubauer, Kyra AU - Redwood, Sabi AU - Cotterill, Nikki TI - <em>“We tend to get pad happy”</em>: a qualitative study of health practitioners’ perspectives on continence care for older people in hospital AID - 10.1101/2020.12.05.20234690 DP - 2020 Jan 01 TA - medRxiv PG - 2020.12.05.20234690 4099 - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2020/12/10/2020.12.05.20234690.short 4100 - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2020/12/10/2020.12.05.20234690.full AB - Background Bladder and bowel control difficulties affect twenty and ten per cent of the UK population respectively, touch all age groups and are particularly prevalent in the older (65+) population. However, the quality of continence care is often poor, compromising patient health and wellbeing, increasing the risk of infection and is a predisposing factor to nursing and residential home placement.Objective To identify factors that help or hinder good continence care in hospital.Methods We conducted 27 qualitative interviews with nursing, medical and allied health practitioners in three hospitals. We used a purposive sample and analysed data thematically, both manually and with the aid of NVivo software.Results Interviews revealed perspectives on practice promoting or inhibiting good quality continence care, as well as suggestions for improvements. Good continence care was said to be advanced through person-centred care, robust assessment and monitoring, and a proactive approach to encouraging patient independence. Barriers to quality care centred on lack of oversight, automatic use of incontinence products and staffing pressures. Suggested improvements centred on participatory care, open communication and care planning with a higher bladder and bowel health profile. In order to drive such improvements, hospital-based practitioners indicate a need and desire for regular continence care training.Conclusions Findings help explain the persistence of barriers to providing good quality care for patients with incontinence. Resolute continence promotion, in hospitals and throughout the NHS, would reduce reliance on products and the accompanying risks of patient dependency and catheter associated gram negative bacteraemia. Robust assessment and care planning, open communication and regular continence care training would assist such promotion and also help mitigate resource limitations by developing safer, time-efficient continence care.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementUniversity Hospitals Bristol NHS Foundation TrustAuthor DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:The University of the West of England Research Ethics Committee. Ethical approval given (Ref: HAS.19.07.221). All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesReasonable requests for data sharing will be considered.