RT Journal Article
SR Electronic
T1 Diagnostic and monitoring utilities of saliva for SARS-CoV-2
JF medRxiv
FD Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press
SP 2020.12.07.20244681
DO 10.1101/2020.12.07.20244681
A1 AbdulRahman, AbdulKarim
A1 AlBastaki, Ahmed
A1 AlAwadhi, Abdulla
A1 Alwazaan, Asmaa
A1 AlQahtani, Manaf
YR 2020
UL http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2020/12/07/2020.12.07.20244681.abstract
AB Introduction Nasopharyngeal (NP) swab is an invasive procedure that is difficult to perform in pediatric cases and those with special needs. On the other hand, saliva has been a proposed sample given the ease of collection, comfort and the ability to self-collect. The research project aims to study the presence of SARS-CoV-2 in the saliva of suspected COVID-19 patients in comparison to its presence in NP swabs.Methodology A cross-sectional study was conducted in October 2020 in COVID19 clinic in the Bahrain Defense Force Hospital. The study compared the presence of SARS-CoV2 by PCR in saliva samples to nasopharyngeal samples. COVID-19 Clinic tests symptomatic, staff, close contacts and pre-operation patients.Results The saliva PCR has shown a sensitivity of 72.9% (95% CI: 58.2% - 84.7%) and a specificity of 98.8% (95% CI: 97.8% - 99.4%). The PPV was 74.5% (95% CI 59.7% to 86.1%) and the NPV was 98.6% (95% CI 97.7% to 99.3%). Kappa coefficient of agreement between saliva and NP was 0.723 (95% CI 0.62 to 0.82, p<0.001). Moreover, when restricting cases to symptomatic only, the sensitivity of saliva increased to 86.7% (95% CI 59.5% to 98.3%) while specificity remained high at 97.2%.Conclusion The findings of the study suggest that saliva samples have the potential to be used as a screening tool for SARS-CoV-2, especially in symptomatic individuals. This is especially important when it is difficult to collect NP samples. Saliva samples are however at risk of producing more false negative tests.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementNoneAuthor DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:The protocol and manuscript for this study were reviewed and approved by the Research and Research Ethics Committee in the Bahrain Defense Force Hospital (Approval Code: BDF/R&REC/2020-494). All methods and retrospective analysis of data was approved by the Committee, and carried out in accordance with local and international guidelines and regulations. Informed consent was waived by the Research and Research Ethics Committee.All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesAvailable on reasonable request to corresponding author