PT - JOURNAL ARTICLE AU - Gavelin, Hanna Malmberg AU - Dong, Christopher AU - Minkov, Ruth AU - Bahar-Fuchs, Alex AU - Ellis, Kathryn A AU - Lautenschlager, Nicola T AU - Mellow, Maddison L AU - Wade, Alexandra T AU - Smith, Ashleigh E AU - Finke, Carsten AU - Krohn, Stephan AU - Lampit, Amit TI - Combined physical and cognitive training for older adults with and without cognitive impairment: A systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials AID - 10.1101/2020.08.08.20170654 DP - 2020 Jan 01 TA - medRxiv PG - 2020.08.08.20170654 4099 - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2020/11/24/2020.08.08.20170654.short 4100 - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2020/11/24/2020.08.08.20170654.full AB - Combining physical exercise with cognitive training is a popular intervention in dementia prevention trials and guidelines. However, it remains unclear what combination strategies are most beneficial for cognitive and physical outcomes. We aimed to compare the efficacy of the three main types of combination strategies (simultaneous, sequential or exergaming) to either intervention alone or control in older adults. Randomized controlled trials of combined cognitive and physical training were included in multivariate and network meta-analyses. In cognitively healthy older adults and mild cognitive impairment, the effect of any combined intervention relative to control was small and statistically significant for overall cognitive (k=41, Hedges’ g = 0.22, 95% CI 0.14 to 0.30) and physical function (k=32, g = 0.25, 95% CI 0.13 to 0.37). Simultaneous training was the most efficacious approach for cognition, followed by sequential combinations and cognitive training alone, and significantly better than physical exercise. For physical outcomes, simultaneous and sequential training showed comparable efficacy as exercise alone and significantly exceeded all other control conditions. Exergaming ranked low for both outcomes. Our findings suggest that simultaneously and sequentially combined interventions are efficacious for promoting cognitive alongside physical health in older adults, and therefore should be preferred over implementation of single-domain training.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Clinical Protocols https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?RecordID=143509 Funding StatementATW is funded by a grant from the Australian National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC GNT1171313). AL is funded by a CR Roper Fellowship from the University of Melbourne.Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:N/AAll necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesAll underlying data are appended to the manuscript.