PT  - JOURNAL ARTICLE
AU  - Arezza, N. J. J.
AU  - Tse, D. H. Y.
AU  - Baron, C. A.
TI  - Rapid Microscopic Fractional Anisotropy Imaging via an Optimized Kurtosis Formulation
AID  - 10.1101/2020.11.23.20237099
DP  - 2020 Jan 01
TA  - medRxiv
PG  - 2020.11.23.20237099
4099  - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2020/11/24/2020.11.23.20237099.short
4100  - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2020/11/24/2020.11.23.20237099.full
AB  - Water diffusion anisotropy in the human brain is affected by disease, trauma, and development. Microscopic fractional anisotropy (μFA) is a diffusion MRI (dMRI) metric that can quantify water diffusion anisotropy independent of neuron fiber orientation dispersion. However, there are several different techniques to estimate μFA and few have demonstrated full brain imaging capabilities within clinically viable scan times and resolutions. Here, we present an optimized spherical tensor encoding (STE) technique to acquire μFA directly from the 2nd order cumulant expansion of the dMRI signal (i.e. diffusion kurtosis) which requires fewer powder-averaged signals than other STE fitting techniques and can be rapidly computed. We found that the optimal dMRI parameters for white matter μFA imaging were a maximum b-value of 2000 s/mm2 and a ratio of isotropic to linear tensor encoded acquisitions of 1.7 for our system specifications. We then compared two implementations of the direct approach to the well-established gamma model in 4 healthy volunteers on a 3 Tesla system. One implementation of the direct cumulant approach used mean diffusivity (D) obtained from a 2nd order fit of the cumulant expansion, while the other used a linear estimation of D from the low b-values. Both implementations of the direct approach showed strong linear correlations with the gamma model (ρ=0.97 and ρ=0.90) but mean biases of −0.11 and −0.02 relative to the gamma model were also observed, respectively. All three μFA measurements showed good test-retest reliability (ρ≥0.79 and bias=0). To demonstrate the potential scan time advantage of the direct approach, 2 mm isotropic resolution μFA was demonstrated over a 10 cm slab using a subsampled data set with fewer powder-averaged signals that would correspond to a 3.3-minute scan. Accordingly, our results introduce an optimization procedure that has enabled clinically relevant, nearly full brain μFA in only several minutes.HighlightsDemonstrated method to acquire optimal parameters for regression μFA imagingμFA measured using an optimized linear regression method at 3TFirst μFA comparison between direct regression approach and the gamma modelBoth approaches correlated strongly in white matter in healthy volunteersNearly full brain μFA demonstrated in a 3.3-minute scan at 2 mm isotropic resolutionCompeting Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementThis work was supported by the Natural Sciences and Engineering Council of Canada [grant number RGPIN‐2018‐05448], Canada Research Chairs [number 950-231993], Canada First Research Excellence Fund to BrainsCAN, and Ontario Graduate Scholarships.Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:Informed consent was obtained before scanning and the study was approved by the Institutional Review Board at Western University.All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesData will be made available and should be referenced as follows: Baron, C., Arezza, N.J.J., 2020. Test-Retest Data Repository for Spherical Tensor Encoding [WWW Document]. URL https://osf.io/etkgx/ https://osf.io/etkgx/