RT Journal Article
SR Electronic
T1 Comparison of Macular Thickness Measurements Using Swept-Source and Spectral-Domain Optical Coherence Tomography in Healthy and Diabetic Subjects
JF medRxiv
FD Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press
SP 2020.11.22.20236307
DO 10.1101/2020.11.22.20236307
A1 Xiong, Kun
A1 Wang, Wei
A1 Gong, Xia
A1 Li, Wangting
A1 Li, Yuting
A1 Meng, Jie
A1 Wang, Langhua
A1 Liang, Xiaoling
A1 Liu, Yizhi
A1 Huang, Wenyong
YR 2020
UL http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2020/11/23/2020.11.22.20236307.abstract
AB Purpose To compare macular thicknesses measured using swept-source optical coherence tomography (SS-OCT) and spectral domain OCT (SD-OCT) in normal subjects, diabetics with diabetic retinopathy (DR) and diabetics without DR (NDR).Methods We analysed 510 normal eyes, 741 NDR eyes and 209 DR eyes. Mean macular thicknesses in Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) subfields, central point thicknesses (CPT), and macular volume were measured by SS-OCT and SD-OCT. We assessed agreement between SS-OCT and SD-OCT measurements by intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) and Bland-Altman plots, and established a conversion equation relating central subfield (CSF), CPT and macular volume between the two devices.Results Macular thickness measurements by SS-OCT were significantly thinner than those by SD-OCT. The mean CSF thickness in normal eyes measured by SD-OCT and SS-OCT were 226.6 ± 19.1 μm (male 236.1 ± 19.1 μm vs female 223.0 ± 17.9 μm, p < 0.0001) and 258.4 ± 19.8 μm. In all three groups, the agreement between SS-OCT and SD-OCT was excellent (all ICC ≥ 0.866). For CSF the conversion equation SD-OCT = 31.95 + 0.999 × SS-OCT was derived. Using the equation, with 99.6% and 97.6% of the predicted values for CSF fell within 10% of the actual measurements in DR and NDR eyes, respectively.Conclusion We propose SS-OCT CSF thicknesses of 275 μm for males and 260 μm for females as the minimum criteria for macular edema in Chinese eyes. And SS-OCT measurements were significantly thinner than those of SD-OCT, we derived an equation to convert SS-OCT measurements to SD-OCT equivalents.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementThis study was funded by the Guangdong Province Science & Technology Plan (2014B020228002).Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:The Institute Ethics Committee of ZOC (2017KYPJ094)All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).Yes I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesThe availability of all data referred to in the manuscript and note links below.