PT - JOURNAL ARTICLE AU - Williams, Lynn AU - Flowers, Paul AU - McLeod, Julie AU - Young, David AU - Rollins, Lesley AU - the CATALYST project team TI - Social patterning and stability of COVID-19 vaccination acceptance in Scotland: Will those most at risk accept a vaccine? AID - 10.1101/2020.11.19.20234682 DP - 2020 Jan 01 TA - medRxiv PG - 2020.11.19.20234682 4099 - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2020/11/19/2020.11.19.20234682.short 4100 - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2020/11/19/2020.11.19.20234682.full AB - Vaccination is central to controlling COVID-19. Its success relies on having safe and effective vaccines and also on high levels of uptake by the public over time. Addressing questions of population-level acceptability, stability of acceptance and sub-population variation in acceptability are imperative. Using a prospective design, a repeated measures two-wave online survey was conducted to assess key sociodemographic variables and intention to accept a COVID-19 vaccine. The first survey (time 1) was completed by 3436 people during the period of national lockdown in Scotland and the second survey (n=2016) was completed two months later (time 2) when restrictions had been eased. At time one, 78% reported being willing to receive a COVID-19 vaccine. Logistic regression analyses showed that there were clear sociodemographic differences in intention to accept a vaccine for COVID-19 with intention being higher in participants of white ethnicity in comparison to Black, Asian, and minority ethnic (BAME) groups, and in those with higher income levels and higher education levels. Intention was also higher in those who were ‘shielding’ due to underlying medical conditions. Our results suggest that future interventions such as mass media and social marketing need to be targeted to a range of sub-populations and diverse communities.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementThis research was funded by the Chief Scientist Office in Scotland (Ref COV/SCL/20/09).Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:University of Strathclyde Ethics CommitteeAll necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesData will be made available upon publication of the paper.