RT Journal Article
SR Electronic
T1 Ethical and psychosocial considerations for hospital personnel in the Covid-19 crisis: Moral injury and resilience
JF medRxiv
FD Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press
SP 2020.11.18.20232272
DO 10.1101/2020.11.18.20232272
A1 Kreh, Alexander
A1 Brancaleoni, Rachele
A1 Magalini, Sabina Chiara
A1 Rosaria Chieffo, Daniela Pia
A1 Flad, Barbara
A1 Ellebrecht, Nils
A1 Juen, Barbara
YR 2020
UL http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2020/11/18/2020.11.18.20232272.abstract
AB This study aims at investigating the nature of resilience and stress experience of health care workers during the COVID-19 pandemic. Thirteen healthcare workers from Italian and Austrian hospitals specifically dealing with COVID-19 patients during the first phase of the pandemic were interviewed. Data was analysed using grounded theory methodology. Psychosocial effects on stress experience, stressors and resilience factors were identified. We generated three hypotheses. Hypothesis one is that moral distress and moral injury are main stressors experienced by healthcare workers. Hypothesis two states that organisational resilience plays an important part in how healthcare workers experience the crisis. Organisational justice and decentralized decision making are essential elements of staff wellbeing. Hypothesis three refers to effective psychosocial support: Basic on scene psychosocial support based on the Hobfoll principles given by trusted and well-known mental health professionals and peers in an integrated approach works best during the pandemic.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementThis project has received funding from the European Unions Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme under grant agreement No. 786670.Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:All professionals interviewed were informed about the scope of the interview and their rights. They subsequently signed an informed consent that was previously reviewed by the NO-FEAR Project External Ethics Advisory Board.All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).Yes I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesFull data connot be shared publicly because they contain potentially identifiying or sensible participant information. However, conceptualized data after using grounded theory methodology can be retrieved from doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4241858 https://zenodo.org/record/4241859#.X7P_IOdCeUk