RT Journal Article
SR Electronic
T1 Can we predict the severe course of COVID-19 – a systematic review and meta-analysis of indicators of clinical outcome?
JF medRxiv
FD Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press
SP 2020.11.09.20228858
DO 10.1101/2020.11.09.20228858
A1 Katzenschlager, Stephan
A1 Zimmer, Alexandra J.
A1 Gottschalk, Claudius
A1 Grafeneder, Juergen
A1 Seitel, Alexander
A1 Maier-Hein, Lena
A1 Benedetti, Andrea
A1 Larmann, Jan
A1 Weigand, Markus A.
A1 McGrath, Sean
A1 Denkinger, Claudia M.
YR 2020
UL http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2020/11/12/2020.11.09.20228858.abstract
AB Background COVID-19 has been reported in over 40million people globally with variable clinical outcomes. In this systematic review and meta-analysis, we assessed demographic, laboratory and clinical indicators as predictors for severe courses of COVID-19.Methods We systematically searched multiple databases (PubMed, Web of Science Core Collection, MedRvix and bioRvix) for publications from December 2019 to May 31st 2020. Random-effects meta-analyses were used to calculate pooled odds ratios and differences of medians between (1) patients admitted to ICU versus non-ICU patients and (2) patients who died versus those who survived. We adapted an existing Cochrane risk-of-bias assessment tool for outcome studies.Results Of 6,702 unique citations, we included 88 articles with 69,762 patients. There was concern for bias across all articles included. Age was strongly associated with mortality with a difference of medians (DoM) of 13.15 years (95% confidence interval (CI) 11.37 to 14.94) between those who died and those who survived. We found a clinically relevant difference between non-survivors and survivors for C-reactive protein (CRP; DoM 69.10, CI 50.43 to 87.77), lactate dehydrogenase (LDH; DoM 189.49, CI 155.00 to 223.98), cardiac troponin I (cTnI; DoM 21.88, CI 9.78 to 33.99) and D-Dimer (DoM 1.29mg/L, CI 0.9 - 1.69). Furthermore, cerebrovascular disease was the co-morbidity most strongly associated with mortality (Odds Ratio 3.45, CI 2.42 to 4.91) and ICU admission (Odds Ratio 5.88, CI 2.35 to 14.73).Discussion This comprehensive meta-analysis found age, cerebrovascular disease, CRP, LDH and cTnI to be the most important risk-factors in predicting severe COVID-19 outcomes and will inform decision analytical tools to support clinical decision-making.Summary In this systematic review we meta-analyzed 88 articles for risk factors of ICU admission and mortality in COVID-19. We found age, cerebrovascular disease, CRP, LDH and cTnI are the most important risk-factors for ICU admission or mortality.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementSM acknowledges support from the National Science Foundation Graduate Research Fellowship Program under Grant No. DGE1745303, National Library Of Medicine of the National Institutes of Health under Award Number T32LM012411, and Fonds de recherche du Quebec-Nature et technologies B1X research scholarship. CMD acknowledges the support of the Heidelberg University Hospital and the German Center of Infectious Disease, where Heidelberg is a core site as part of the tuberculosis focus group. The work was supported by Heidelberg University Hospital internal funds Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the funding agencies.Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:This is not a clinical trial. It was registered at Prospero Registrationnumber:CRD42020177154All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesAll available data is published either in the manuscript or the supplementary file. For more data please contact the author.