PT - JOURNAL ARTICLE AU - Rothe, Miguel AU - Rohm, Elsa AU - Mitchell, Elizabeth AU - Bedrosian, Noah AU - Kelly, Christine AU - String, Gabrielle AU - Lantagne, Daniele TI - A systematic review of mask disinfection and reuse for SARS-CoV-2 (through July 10, 2020) AID - 10.1101/2020.11.11.20229880 DP - 2020 Jan 01 TA - medRxiv PG - 2020.11.11.20229880 4099 - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2020/11/12/2020.11.11.20229880.short 4100 - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2020/11/12/2020.11.11.20229880.full AB - We conducted a systematic review of hygiene intervention effectiveness against SARS-CoV-2, including developing inclusion criteria, conducting the search, selecting articles for inclusion, and summarizing included articles. We reviewed 104,735 articles, and 109 articles meeting inclusion criteria were identified, with 33 additional articles identified from reference chaining. Herein, we describe results from 58 mask disinfection and reuse studies, where the majority of data were collected using N95 masks. Please note, no disinfection method consistently removed >3 log of virus irrespective of concentration, contact time, temperature, and humidity. However, results show it is possible to achieve >3 log reduction of SARS-CoV-2 using appropriate concentrations and contact times of chemical (ethanol, hydrogen peroxide, peracetic acid), radiation (PX-UV, UVGI), and thermal (autoclaving, heat) disinfection on N95 masks. N95 mask reuse and failure data indicate that hydrogen peroxide, heat, and UV-GI are promising for mask reuse, peracetic acid and PX-UV need more data, and autoclaving and ethanol lead to mask durability failures. Data on other mask types is limited. We thus recommend focusing guidelines and further research on the use of heat, hydrogen peroxide, and UVGI for N95 mask disinfection/reuse. All of these disinfection options could be investigated for use in LMIC and humanitarian contexts.Synopsis In resource-limited contexts, N95s are reused. We recommend using heat, hydrogen peroxide, or UVGI to disinfect and reuse N95 masks.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementThe authors would like to thank the funders of this work, including: TISCH College of Civic Life at Tufts University (funding for Bedrosian, Rohm, Rothe), D. Lantagne discretionary funding (funding for Bedrosian, Mitchell, Rohm, Rothe), and NSF 1657218 (funding for Kelly).Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:Not applicable - no human subjects.All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesAll data is appended in the attached Annex.