RT Journal Article
SR Electronic
T1 SARS-CoV-2 detection by nasal strips: a superior tool for surveillance of pediatric populations
JF medRxiv
FD Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press
SP 2020.10.28.20220673
DO 10.1101/2020.10.28.20220673
A1 Chan, Renee WY
A1 Chan, Kate C
A1 Chan, Kathy YY
A1 Lui, Grace CY
A1 Tsun, Joseph GS
A1 Wong, Rity YK
A1 Yu, Michelle WL
A1 Wang, Maggie HT
A1 Chan, Paul KS
A1 Lam, Hugh Simon
A1 Li, Albert M
YR 2020
UL http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2020/11/12/2020.10.28.20220673.abstract
AB Background Deep throat saliva (DTS) and pooled nasopharyngeal swab and throat swab (NPSTS) are utilized for viral detection. DTS is challenging for children. Swabbing the respiratory mucosa requires trained personnel and may trigger sneezing and coughing, which generate droplets. A reliable, simple and safe sampling method applicable to a wide age range is required for community-based surveillance.Methods We introduced nasal strip as an easy and low-risk collection method. Asymptomatic and symptomatic SARS-CoV-2 infected patients (n = 38) were recruited. Nasal epithelial lining fluid (NELF) (n = 43) strip paired with nasal swab (n = 13) were collected by a healthcare worker to compare with NPSTS (n = 21) or DTS (n =22) collected within 24 hours as reference. All samples were subjected to viral RNA quantitation by real-time PCR targeting the nucleoprotein gene.Results Comparable Ct values were observed between paired nasal strip and nasal swab samples. The agreement between nasal strip samples and NPSTS was 94.44% and 100% for NPSTS positive and negative samples. Higher viral RNA concentration was detected in nasal strips than DTS samples. False-negative results were recorded in six DTS specimens, of which four were from children. Storage at room temperature up to 72 (n = 3) hours did not affect diagnostic yield of nasal strips.Conclusions Nasal strip is a reliable and non-invasive sampling method for SARS-CoV-2 detection, and viral detection remains stable for at least 72 hours. It can be used as an alternative tool for community-based surveillance.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementThe study was supported by the HMRF-commissioned grant (Ref: COVID190112 to RWYC, COVID190103 to MHW and COVID190107 to PKSC), Project Impact Enhancement Fund (PIEF) - COVID-19 (Ref: PIEF/Ph2/COVID/06 to MHW) and Hong Kong Institute of Allergy Research Grant 2020 to RWYC.Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:Joint Chinese University of Hong Kong, New Territories East Cluster Clinical Research Ethics Committee (CREC: 2020.076 and 2020.442)All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesNot applicable