RT Journal Article
SR Electronic
T1 Execution of intervention matters more than strategy: A lesson from the spatiotemporal assessment of COVID-19 clusters in Nepal
JF medRxiv
FD Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press
SP 2020.11.07.20227520
DO 10.1101/2020.11.07.20227520
A1 Acharya, Bipin Kumar
A1 Khanal, Laxman
A1 Mahyoub, Alnwisi Sameh Mansoor
A1 Ruan, Zengliang
A1 Yang, Yin
A1 Adhikari, Samir Kumar
A1 Pandit, Shreejana
A1 Neupane, Basanta Kumar
A1 Paudel, Binod Kumar
A1 Lin, Hualiang
YR 2020
UL http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2020/11/10/2020.11.07.20227520.abstract
AB The novel coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) has been the biggest public health problem of the present world. As the number of people suffering from the pandemic is rising, it is likely to claim more life and worsen the global health and economy. Nepal, one of the developing countries in the south Asia has been strongly influenced by the pandemic and struggling to contain it with multiple interventions, however, spatiotemporal dynamics of the epidemic and its linkage with various intervention strategies has not been studied yet. Here, we employed the prospective spatial-temporal analysis with SaTScan assessing dynamics of the COVID-19 cases from 23 January to 31 August 2020 at district level in Nepal. The results revealed that COVID-19 dynamics in the early stage of transmission was slower and confined in certain districts. However, from the third week of April, transmission spread rapidly across districts of Province No. 2 and Sudoorpaschim Province, primarily introduced by Nepalese citizens returning from India. Despite nationwide lockdown, nine statistically significant active and emerging clusters were detected between 23 January and 21 July 2020, whereas ten emerging clusters were observed for extended period to 31 August. The population density and population inflow from India crossing the sealed border had significant effects on the elevated risk of the epidemic. The capital city Kathmandu has become the highest-risk active cluster since August when travel restriction has been suspended. Movement restriction appears to be the most effective non-pharmaceutical intervention against the COVID-19 for resource-scarce countries with limited health care facilities. Our findings could be valuable to the health authorities within Nepal and beyond to better allocate resources and improve interventions on the pandemic for containing it efficiently.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementNational Natural Science Foundation of China (82041021).Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:NAAll necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesAll data used in the manuscript are freely available.