RT Journal Article
SR Electronic
T1 Face Mask Fit Hacks: Improving the Fit of KN95 Masks and Surgical Masks with Fit Alteration Techniques
JF medRxiv
FD Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press
SP 2020.10.28.20221895
DO 10.1101/2020.10.28.20221895
A1 O’Kelly, Eugenia
A1 Arora, Anmol
A1 Pirog, Sophia
A1 Pearson, Charlotte
A1 Ward, James
A1 Clarkson, P John
YR 2020
UL http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2020/11/03/2020.10.28.20221895.abstract
AB The COVID-19 pandemic has drawn unprecedented attention to the use of masks and fabric face coverings to prevent the spread of respiratory viruses, such as SARS-CoV-2. The fit of a mask has been identified as one the primary factors in determining the effectiveness of masks. If substantial gaps exist between the mask and the wearers face, air may take the path of least resistance through gaps and avoid filtration, both during inhalation and exhalation. A number of techniques, referred to as fit hacks have emerged to improve the fit of face masks. In this paper we test a variety of fit hacks on surgical masks and KN95 masks to compare their effectiveness. We identify fit hacks which greatly improved the fit of masks, and thus their effectiveness.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementNo external funding was received.Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:Ethical approval has been obtained from the Cambridge University, Department of Engineering, Division C ethical review comittee.All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesData used will be freely availible on the Cambridge University open data repository "Apollo".