RT Journal Article
SR Electronic
T1 Analytical evaluation and critical appraisal of early commercial SARS-CoV-2 immunoassays for routine use in a diagnostic laboratory
JF medRxiv
FD Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press
SP 2020.10.20.20215970
DO 10.1101/2020.10.20.20215970
A1 Cramer, Amanda
A1 Goodman, Nigel
A1 Cross, Timothy
A1 Gant, Vanya
A1 Dziadzio, Magdalena
YR 2020
UL http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2020/10/21/2020.10.20.20215970.abstract
AB BACKGROUND The objective of this study was to evaluate the performance characteristics of early commercial SARS-CoV-2 antibody assays in mild and asymptomatic subjects to enable the selection of suitable serological assays for routine diagnostic use within HCA Healthcare UK.METHODS We used serum samples from a pre-Covid era patient cohort (n=50, pre-December 2019), designated SARS-CoV-2 negative, and serum samples from a SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR-positive cohort (n=90) taken > 14 days post symptom onset (April-May 2020). We evaluated 6 ELISA assays including one confirmation assay to investigate antibody specificity. We also evaluated one point-of-care lateral flow device and one high throughput electrochemiluminescence immunoassay.RESULTS The ELISA specificities ranged from 84-100%, with sensitivities ranging from 75.3-90.0%. The LFIA showed 100% specificity and 80% sensitivity using smaller sample numbers. The Roche CLIA immunoassay showed 100% specificity and 90.7% sensitivity. When used in conjunction, the Euroimmun nucleocapsid (NC) and spike-1 (S1) IgG ELISA assays had a sensitivity of 95.6%. The confirmation IgG assay showed 92.6% of samples tested contained both NC and S1 antibodies, 32.7% had NC, S1 and S2 and 0% had either S1 or S2 only.CONCLUSIONS These first generation assays were not calibrated against reference material and the results are reported qualitatively. The Roche assay and the Euroimmun NC and S1 assays had the best sensitivity overall in our hands. Combining the assays detecting NC and S1/S2 antibody increased diagnostic yield. A portfolio of next generation SARS-CoV-2 immunoassays will be necessary in any future studies of herd and vaccine induced immunity.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementNo external funding was required for this study.Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:The study was reviewed by the local HCA Audit and Research Committee.All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesThe data referred to in the manuscript is held securely within the department of Immunology at HCA laboratories.The data referred to in the manuscript is held securely within the department of Immunology at HCA laboratories.